My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2014 05 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2014 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2014 05 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:21 AM
Creation date
7/31/2014 10:42:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2014 05 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 8, 2014 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />width along Cannon Street, or a mutually support design alternative that is <br />open and accessible. <br />3. A public art master plan be submitted at time of Phase 2, showing how public <br />art/signage will be integrated throughout the development. The public <br />art/signage should reflect the previous historic use of this area for the Louisville <br />Rod and Gun Club. <br /> <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Brauneis asks in regard to Phase 1 and 1A, initially did we reduce the density? <br />Russ answers original PUD had 72 townhomes and it was reduced to 55. <br />Brauneis asks about the actual density count of units per acre, was this less than was <br />required? <br />Russ answers not sure about required but it is less than what was allowed. <br />Moline asks about the waiver for have the height limit lowered for the one structure. <br />Does this apply to a single lot or an entire block? <br />Russ says there is a transition zone so the block facing Griffith required the and one <br />story. There is a 2-story requirement, and it is a 1-story building. The waiver applies to <br />the single structure. <br />Tengler asks about more public space because of the mews. Will it realistically be used <br />as public space or primarily used as a front yard for the residents? <br />Russ answers a combination of both. They have public access right to it and sidewalks <br />will be going through there. <br />st <br />Tengler asks about waiver on 1floor retail, apart from this particular discussion, is it <br />likely that we will see this come up again? <br />Russ answers that the DELO Phase 2 preliminary has ground floor residential along the <br />entirety of Cannon Street; however, they kept ground floor retail on South Street and the <br />corner of South and Cannon. The preliminary did look at the economic and the fiscal <br />impacts associated with Phase 2 going to ground floor residential. <br /> says the Planning Commission got a memo from the City Engineer to Sean <br />McCartney. Would you say the proposed conditions of approval address the concerns <br />from the City Engineer? <br />Russ says the City Engineer is leading the design of the off-site facility. This project of <br />Phase 1 meets all the water retention and water quality requirements. <br /> asks about the request for the setback for townhomes. <br />Russ says the rear setback of the parcels with the setback faces alley. The mews <br />faces the front door. <br />Rice asks whether the minimum lot width waiver applies only to the lot where the 50- <br />year old building is being moved? I note there is a request to vary the minimum lot from <br /> Is it just for this one lot? <br />Russ says it is just for the 50-year old house. The landscaping around to the house may <br />make the lot look wider than the townhomes, but this is the only lot requesting a waiver. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.