Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 9, 2014 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />Approved by voice vote. <br /> <br />Regular Business – <br /> <br />Old Louisville Inn final PUD: <br /> A final planned unit development (PUD) to <br /> <br />allow for a 998 square foot addition to the south of the existing Old <br />Louisville Inn restaurant at 740 Front Street. <br /> <br /> Applicant, Owner and Representative: Historic 740 Front Street LLC <br /> <br /> Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner I <br /> <br /> <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Published in the Camera on December 22, 2013. Posted in City Hall, the Library, the <br />Recreation Center, the Police and Court Building and mailed to surrounding property <br />owners on December 20, 2013. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Robinson presented from Power Point: <br /> Zoned CC <br />o <br /> Located in Downtown Louisville <br />o <br /> Adding 990 SF to south of existing Old Louisville Inn <br />o <br />Addition will be stepped back from original structure <br />o <br />18 foot maximum height (1 story) <br />o <br /> Loading in the rear of the building, off the alley <br />o <br /> Must comply with Downtown Design Handbook – all project elements are <br />o <br />in compliance <br /> No additional parking required <br />o <br /> Building is in flood plain so a flood plain development permit is required – <br />o <br />add as condition of approval <br /> Staff recommends approval <br />o <br /> <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br /> <br />Russell asked what the PC’s roll was for the flood plain. <br />Robinson stated none. It is a Board of Adjustment issue. <br />Moline asked if it is common to have the addition subordinate to the originally structure. <br />Robinsons stated the Secretary of Interior Standards state this is historic best practices. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />John Gstalter presented for the owners/development group. He gave the following <br />reasons for redevelopment: <br /> <br /> <br /> New Restrooms <br /> <br /> <br /> Main Dining Room to separate from pub area <br /> <br />