Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 9, 2014 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> Enhance the bar experience in front with bar tables and stem wall, accentuating <br />the historic bar <br /> <br /> <br /> Landmarking the building to preserve its original character <br /> <br /> <br /> Restoring original windows along Front Street – using similar windows on <br />addition <br /> <br /> <br /> Designed as single story and flat roof so not to dwarf existing building <br /> <br /> <br /> Have worked with adjacent property owner since addition will be very close to <br />their existing building <br /> <br />Gstalter gave details of how the existing building will be restored and preserved. <br /> <br />Russ stated the interior improvements do not require landmarking or PUD approval. <br />The applicant could begin doing interior work today. <br /> <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Brauneis asked if the applicant has a comment on the condition for needing a flood <br />plain permit. <br /> <br />Gstalter stated he understands they are working with an old building and understand <br />there are elements beyond their control. Based on the engineers’ findings, they believe <br />they will be successful in receiving their flood development permit. <br /> <br />Tengler inquired if they were planning on removing or moving the existing bar. <br /> <br />Gstalter stated they will not be moving the bar – the entry into the addition will be made <br />on both sides of the bar, but will not affect it. <br /> <br />Tengler asked if a roof top deck was considered. <br /> <br />Gstalter stated they had looked into it but the required stairway would take out too much <br />floor space on the interior of the building to be worthwhile it. <br /> <br />O’Connell asked if the current PUD would allow for the reconstruction of the old Tivoli <br />sign. <br /> <br />Robinson stated it is not currently part of the PUD, so they would need to amend the <br />PUD to allow for the sign. <br /> <br />Pritchard asked if they were looking to rebrand. <br /> <br />Gstalter stated they are looking into it and assume the new operator would want to <br />change the name. <br /> <br />Pritchard asked staff if the sign could change from now until City Council. <br /> <br />Russ stated no. Signs which are not included in the PUD must then comply with the <br />Downtown Sign Manual. <br /> <br />