My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 07 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 07 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
8/6/2014 10:34:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 07 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 15, 2014 <br />Page 12 of 21 <br />Council member Keany voiced his appreciation for the information and looked forward <br />to future discussions at a study session. <br />Mayor Muckle felt the study showed evidence of blight and supported staff bringing <br />back a resolution for Council review. He stated the building has been vacant for four <br />years and has a blighted influence on the entire McCaslin corridor. He felt it would take <br />the urban renewal power to redevelop the area. <br />Economic Development Director DeJong stated if Council requests the staff bring back <br />a resolution determining blight, that step is generally completed at the same time an <br />urban renewal plan is adopted. The City's Urban Renewal Counsel recommends both <br />the resolution and the urban renewal plan come forward at the same time. <br />City Manager Fleming explained the intent of bringing forward the resolution and the <br />urban renewal plan together is to advise Council which specific actions are being <br />proposed to address blight conditions. <br />Mayor Muckle proposed the resolution and the urban renewal plan should be a two -step <br />process. Council Lipton stated if a two -step process is followed, prior to the second <br />step, he would like the Council to have a chance to discuss the plan with legal counsel. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton opposed having staff come back with a resolution finding blight. <br />Council member Keany would accept a two -step process, but would not feel <br />comfortable with developing an urban renewal plan without knowing the costs and <br />getting further legal counsel. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton commented that a finding of blight and a possible condemnation <br />to eliminate the burdensome conditions of blight would favor the applicant. He felt the <br />current owner was aware of the conditions, as well as the additional restrictions. He <br />noted covenants and conditions are part of every commercial development. If the <br />property was abandoned, neglected, or unsafe he would support moving forward. He <br />noted the sales tax loss suffered when Sam's Club closed has been overcome as <br />current sales tax receipts have surpassed the 2006 receipts. He was not in favor of the <br />survey and is not in favor of the resolution or the urban renewal plan. <br />Council member Moss agreed with Mayor Pro Tem Dalton's comments. She felt the <br />buyer was aware of the restrictions when he recently purchased the property. She did <br />not feel enough time has passed for the City to become involved. <br />Council member Lipton was in favor of a free market approach to the future <br />development of the property. However, he noted that the public has become <br />increasingly uncomfortable with the vacant building and safety conditions. He was not a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.