My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 08 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 08 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:17 PM
Creation date
8/21/2014 9:13:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2014 08 18
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 21, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />Stewart stated he felt as though the numbers are appropriate for both grant requests. He <br />added the purposes of the incentives are to maintain the scale and character of the Downtown <br />while preserving historic materials. <br />Haley asked if the residence component would be eligible for the new construction grants. <br />Robinson stated all of the grant money is being requested for the new addition only. <br />Fahey made a motion to forward the grant request to Council as presented. He requests the <br />verbal presentation should be included in the record since it outlined the intent of the request. <br />Fasick seconded the motion. <br />Motion was approved 4 to 0. <br />La Grave abstained from the vote since he arrived in the middle of the discussion. <br />Probable Cause Determination — 1245 Grant <br />Haley brought back this item since there is now a quorum. <br />Stewart recused himself. <br />Robinson presented the materials in the staff report, which involves finding probably <br />cause for landmarking, which then allows the applicant to move towards the building <br />assessment. He added the review criterion are the same as a landmark request, even <br />though this is not a landmark request. <br />Andy Johnson, DAJ Design, presented as the architect for the property. He stated he is <br />often asked if a structure is worthy of restoring. He believes this structure is worthy <br />restoring because it is a simple home and has maintained most of its historical form. <br />Cindy and Harry Thomas, owners, spoke in regards to the possibility of landmarking <br />their house. <br />Public Comments <br />None heard. <br />Board Discussion <br />Haley stated the social history supports the landmarking, especially if the porch can be <br />restored. <br />Fahey agreed with Haley. <br />La Grave stated he believes the social history and structure qualifies for landmarking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.