Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Thompson is in favor of letting Condition No. 9 go. She does like the stone that <br />the applicant has brought in. She would also like to see more natural stone. Commissioner <br />Thompson agrees with Condition No. 12 as written by Staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Ellerman stated that in the existing Corporate Center I, there are 320 parking spaces. In the <br />new building, which is a little bit bigger, not much, they only have 369. That is not more than 5 <br />per 1,000 as the Commission may be custom to seeing. The other parks in the area are <br />considerably below that number. This number puts the applicant in a better position to compete <br />and feel that is necessary. They do not feel that this is over parked in the market place. <br /> <br />Motion made by Christopher Leh to approve Resolution No. 16, Series 2000, as written by Staff, <br />with the exception of Condition No. 9, which would be deleted and the addition of a condition to <br />the suggested in a friendly amendment. Seconded by Patricia Thompson. <br /> <br />Chairman Lipton proposed a friendly amendment that the parking ratio be reduced to 4.1:1000 <br />and that the land that is recaptured by doing that be put into some sort of landscaping form, and <br />that the applicant, when able to show a demonstrated need to Staff, may change that landscaping <br />to some sort of additional parking. <br /> <br />Accepted by Christopher Leh and Patricia Thompson. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kalish stated that on Condition No. 9, it was only the first half of the condition that <br />the applicant wanted struck. The portion regarding the brick at the base and corner portions of <br />the building should remain. <br /> <br />Accepted by Christopher Leh and Patricia Thompson. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Christopher Leh, Yes; Bill McDermott, Yes; Debra Kalish, Yes; Patricia <br />Thompson, Yes; Chris Pritchard, Yes; Tom McAvinew, Yes; Jeff Lipton, Yes. Motion approved <br />7:0. <br /> <br />7. Tentatively scheduled items for April 20, 2000: <br /> <br />Jeff Lipton informed the Commission that the item that was scheduled for April 20, 2000, has <br />been postponed to the May 9, 2000, meeting. <br /> <br />8. Tentatively scheduled items for May 9, 2000: <br /> <br />th <br />Mr. Johnstone stated that the only application that is off of the agenda for May 9 is the Eldorado <br />Artesian Springs. Everything else is still on track. <br /> <br /> <br />9.Staff Comments: <br /> <br /> <br /> 18 <br /> <br />