Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard: – Support PSCo to build where the existing power line is. Not sure it <br />will help to continue the discussion. <br /> <br />Chairman Lipton – Agrees with Chris Pritchard to a certain extent. We need to be balanced in <br />how we approach this. PSCo does have certain vested rights to use the right-of-way they already <br />have. Also feel that they can’t go in and upgrade without city approval. Perhaps cost should not <br />be the cheapest. Do not believe they meet SRU criteria. Perhaps request staff to draft denial for <br />the January meeting <br /> <br />Commissioner McDermott – frustrated with all we have been provided. We are missing data that <br />has transpired during this whole process. We either continue with an understanding that all <br />information be provided or follow the line of reasoning to deny the application. <br /> <br />Commissioner McAvinew – Ask for a split out of the operation/maintenance of above ground and <br />underground. Not hopeful of what will come out of PUC hearing. Hopes that Xcel/PSCo will <br />improve their long term planning, this is what needs to happen. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton – We should restate the intent on the original findings, evaluations and <br />recommendation to continue to consider alternatives. We need to look at the economic impacts <br />on the immediate neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Commissioner Leh – Good idea to revise resolution to reflect additional process and finds since <br />the original Resolution #12. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kalish – We need to get rid of the burial discussion and add in the recommendation <br />on the alternative routes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Leh moved to continue the resolution to consider an updated resolution of denial, <br />reaffirming Resolution #12. Commissioner Kalish seconded. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: Commissioner Pritchard – No; Commissioner McDermott – No; Commissioner <br />Leh – Yes; Commissioner McAvinew – Yes; Commissioner Kalish – Yes; Chairman Lipton – <br />Yes. <br /> <br />Motion passed. <br /> <br /> Resolution No. 52, Series 2000 <br />, Preliminary plat and preliminary PUD development plan for <br />an office/warehouse/manufacturing development, Dillon Center, on the north side of Dillon <br />Road and 300 feet east of the Pierce Avenue intersection. Case # 00-39-PS/PP <br /> <br />Staff Public Notice Certification: <br /> <br /> <br /> 14 <br /> <br />