My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2000 12 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2000 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2000 12 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:13 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 2:16:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2000 12 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ordered. City council will still want to hear what you desire, perhaps the poles are not what you <br />prefer and city council will want to hear that. On the remand, direction can be given to council in <br />the form of a motion or by directing the staff to write up what ever recommendation and <br />consultants you might reach at the end of this meeting and have them passed on to City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner McDermott: We can also continue this issue to January. <br />Are you saying we can deny this application and recommend a pole type. <br /> <br />Sam Light: You have two separate issues – pole type and route. <br /> <br />Commissioner Leh: On the routing issue we are not empowered to select an alternate routes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kalish – Do some of these segments travel along current PSCo right-of-way. <br /> <br />Paul Wood pointed out the segments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kalish – Then I have a question to applicant that I would like answered in his <br />presentation, why was the western area not considered as the portion to update. <br /> <br />Chairman Lipton – Sam, does PSCo have any rights of condemnation or do they leave that to the <br />county and city? <br /> <br />Sam Light: Public Utilities have a private right of condemnation. <br /> <br />Applicant Presentation: <br /> <br />Michael Diehl: I represent Cell energy. He introduced other representatives of Xcel (legal counsel, <br />environment consultants, land rights manager, project manager, manager of community services) <br />Requested copy of Dec 11 letter from Mr. Schlott and clarified inclusions in the commission <br />packet. <br /> <br />The issues to address this evening - We need approval now to continue quality electric service to <br />Louisville and for future growth. If this work is not performed the existing line may experience <br />overhead problems and we may be forced to interrupt electric service, resulting in power outages <br />as early as summer of 2001. The project is similar to a highway improvement. Varying the line <br />would cost an additional $8 million and funds are not available. <br /> <br />Pole type: We addressed the pole type issue with the public and from the information gather and <br />from staff we proceeded and order the poles. There is a 22-week lead-time to get pole delivery. <br />That’s why they have been ordered. <br /> <br />Route evaluation: Based on conversation with numerous meetings with the City Manager, Paul <br />Wood and Public Works director and the city council input we evaluated the routes. We are not <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.