Laserfiche WebLink
<br />proposing an alternative route! Based on the analysis rebuilding the line in the present alignment is <br />the best alternative. The Nov 21 analysis is included in your packet. We do not want to condemn <br />homes, nor pick a route that is the more expensive. Many of the alternate routes are in <br />unincorporated Boulder County. <br /> <br />Members of the Public: <br /> <br />Jim Keener - 788 W. Lois Ct., Louisville, CO 80027. - a member of the Louisville Power Line <br />Corridor Association. We support city council to remand the issue to the Planning Commission <br />as an alternative to the denial of the proposal. We would like to have Ray Schlott appointed to <br />some type of capacity to work with the city on this study. We also request the use of outside <br />expert and have a list of consultants to share with council. <br /> <br />Dave Wilkinson, 749 Peach Ct., Louisville, CO 80027. – I am interested in the alternate routes <br />and encourage you to look closely at Ray Schlotts material and consider his proposal. Please keep <br />an open mind. I take exception to the pole type. He has talked to no one that favors the 90-ft <br />pole. <br /> <br />Fred Backes, 793 W. Tamarisk St, Louisville, CO 80027. – He had a couple of reflections on the <br />PSCo study of alternative routes. Alternative #3 and #4 – please ask why is it necessary to <br />condemn property along some of the alternative routes. Alternative #3 and #4 have a lot of <br />potential. #3 has no homes, and #4 has only 19 homes of which 3200 ft would be buried at those <br />homes along McCaslin. Cost of acquisition should be considered. Be sure the route you are <br />considering is in the city of Louisville because some of them are in the county instead of the city. <br />Can the city get the right-of-way easements along the Mesa out to Highway 36? In alternative <br />#4 it would go from 3200 feet of burial to 7200 feet of burial. The final question is how to fund it. <br /> <br />Mike Gheleta, 761 Pear Ct., Louisville, CO 80027. – Staff report describing land use proceedings <br />are accurate. We have a remand to consider the alternatives, consisting of re-routing and pole <br />types. Unfortunately, the Public Utility Commission (PUC) likely does not have an accurate view <br />of what has happened. PSCo has filed with the PUC a petition for a declaratory order asking that <br />the PUC rule that this line must be upgraded now. Read items of interests from the petition to the <br />PUC that demonstrates that PSCo has misrepresented what has been happening. Please consider <br />all the analysis presented either by PSCo or Ray Schlott. <br /> <br />Tom Henson – 755 Pear Ct, Louisville, CO 80027. – Had the opportunity to read brief prepared <br />by PSCo and does not like what has been given to PUC. Please consider alternatives. <br /> <br />Hearing no additional audience that wish to speak I will now turn it over to the Commissioners <br />for their questions. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br /> <br /> <br /> 10 <br /> <br />