Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Lipton read the above Resolution and reminded the Commissioners that this was an ongoing <br />business item that they had directed the staff to draft a new resolution of denial for the special <br />review use requested by Xcel Energy. <br /> <br />Lipton requested if any of the Commissioners had any additional disclosures other than Thompson <br />being recused for conflict of interest. Hearing none he requested public notice certification. <br /> <br />Staff Public Notice Certification: <br />Paul Wood reported that no additional notice was done because this was a continued business <br />item from the December 12, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting. <br /> <br />Lipton requested staff report. <br /> <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Wood clarified that Public Service Company is now Xcel Energy. On December 12, 2000, the <br />Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a remand received from the City Council <br />from Council’s September 19, 2000 meeting. On December 12, 2000 the Planning Commission <br />approved a motion to direct staff to prepare additional findings and conclusions and bring those <br />back to the Commission for adoption on January 9, 2001. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed the Special Review Use criteria that are required when considering SRU <br />applications as outlined by the City’s zoning code. <br /> <br />NOTE: Leh arrived at 6:42 P.M. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed the dates of action for the SRU and the testimony of the witnesses, documents <br />and other evidence that is part of the record, as noted in Resolution 1, Series 2001 (items ‘a’ <br />through ‘o’). <br /> <br />Wood requested a motion to adopt the resolution and add to the record the staff report, <br />resolution and attached e-mails that were in their packets. <br /> <br />Questions for Staff: <br />Lipton clarified that the resolution is on the original request and is not on the relocation of the <br />power line. <br /> <br />Lipton requested applicant presentation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Michael Diehl, representing Xcel Energy, gave a brief statement and clarified that the SRU <br />proposal is to rebuild the existing line. <br /> <br />Lipton requested public comment and asked each to state name and address. <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br />