Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Mr. Wood feels confident that Staff will be able to package this application for City Council so that <br />they will not have to act as the Planning Commission on August 3. Staff would like direction on the <br />signage at this time and then they will be able to take it to City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Wood went over all of the Conditions with the Planning Commissioners and explained how <br />many of them were either combined or have already been taken care of. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard asked what the Cities position was on the current drainage. <br /> <br />Craig Kitzman stated that the design of the pond is acceptable from the shape and the volume and <br />the release rates are there. It works. <br /> <br />The only area that the Planning Commissioners are concerned about is the signage. Most of the <br />other conditions can be worked out. <br /> <br />Mr. Stratton responded that they would be prepared to bring it back to the Planning Commission. If <br />they receive some direction they would be able to come up with a signage plan that would be <br />acceptable. They are in search of direction and will come forth with the signage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton asked if they were going to approve a monument sign for the Comfort Inn, on <br />who’s PUD would they approve it on. On this PUD or the Comfort Inn as an amendment. Mr. <br />Wood stated that it would be on this PUD because it is on this PUD. <br /> <br />Lipton asked if they wanted to approve a change of signage for the Comfort Inn building they would <br />have to come in and request a change to their own PUD. Mr. Wood stated that was correct. <br /> <br />Staff Summary: <br /> <br />Mr. Ranu stated that the Staff is recommending approval with conditions in Resolution No. 32. Staff <br />feels that this is a good project even though there are a lot of conditions, many of which are minor <br />tracking issues. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />Mr. Stratton stated that they are hopeful that the Planning Commission will give them approval at <br />this time. There are tenants waiting and financing that is on the line. They feel that they have done <br />what they said they would do in the past and will continue to do so. <br /> <br />Mr. Junge stated that there are really only 5 conditions with a couple of sub-pieces attached. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed/Commission Comment/Vote: <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton recognizes that many of these conditions are just housekeeping. He does not <br />feel that the PC would need to see this again. <br /> <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br />