My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
9/17/2014 8:00:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 2, 2014 <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />Boston sought recertification in May of 2011 and in 2012 they received recertification. <br />Comcast filed a new effective competition petition one month after the ruling and the <br />City of Boston has not been able to regulate rates. Another matter for Council <br />consideration is the challenges and cost to regulate rates. <br />Recommendation: Staff agreed there is a lack of real competition in the cable television <br />market, but did not recommend pursuing a ruling from the FCC for two reasons: 1) It is <br />likely such a petition would be costly and, based on other cases, the City is unlikely to <br />prevail and preserve the ability to regulate basic service tier rates and as such, this is <br />not a good use of City funds. 2) While a successful petition would give the City the <br />authority to regulate Comcast's basic service tier rates, staff did not believe the time and <br />expense associated with this activity would be the best use of City's limited resources. <br />Both Mayor Pro Tem Dalton and Nancy Rodgers, the City's legal counsel, were <br />available to respond to Council's questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Alan Sobel, 1428 Kennedy Avenue, Louisville, CO presented the City Council with a <br />handout relative to the Code of Federal Regulations ( "CFR "). He noted from the City's <br />presentation they assume the onerous task of determining whether there is effective <br />competition or not effective competition is on the City and the associated costs. He <br />found the assumption odd and questioned why the City feels they have a legal burden <br />to prove or disprove effective competition. He referenced CFR Regulations relative to <br />effective competition. He questioned why the City believes they have the legal burden <br />to prove or disprove effective competition and for paying for it. He requested the City <br />provide a legal opinion rebutting the three Codes of Federal Regulations and why the <br />City feels it has the legal burden to prove or disprove effective competition and for <br />paying for it. <br />Nancy Rodgers, Kissinger & Feldman P.C., explained she has been working with Mayor <br />Pro Tem Dalton and Acting Deputy City Manager Muth on the cable franchise <br />negotiations with Comcast. She noted Mr. Sobel brought up a good point however <br />those apply when there is no finding of effective competition. The three citations <br />provided by Mr. Sobel have a demonstration to the contrary of a finding of effective <br />competition. Louisville has actual knowledge there is effective competition and doing a <br />petition to reconsider is a different standard. The City would have to provide the FCC a <br />reason to reconsider their former finding and inform them things have changed. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann asked if a finding of effective competition is perpetual. <br />Ms. Rodgers responded yes unless the current law is changed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.