My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
9/17/2014 8:00:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 2, 2014 <br />Page 9 of 16 <br />VOTE: Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 7 -0. <br />DISCUSSION /DIRECTION /ACTION — EFFECTIVE COMPETITION <br />PETITION TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION <br />Mayor Muckle requested a staff presentation. <br />Acting Deputy City Manager Muth explained during the ongoing Comcast franchise <br />discussions staff has been asked multiple times if the City has the ability to regulate <br />rates as a part of the franchise. Under Federal Law a Local Franchise Authority (LFA) <br />may regulate the rate of the basic tier of cable service only if there is no finding of <br />"effective competition." If the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finds there is <br />"effective competition" in the municipality the LFA may not regulate the rates of the <br />basic service tier. Because of the number of requests received during the Comcast <br />negotiations process, staff is requesting Council direction on whether to proceed with <br />the effective competition petition. <br />In 2005, Comcast filed a Petition for Reconsideration and Special Relief, also known as <br />an effective competition proceeding, for a number of Cities in the metro area, including <br />Louisville. In 2006, Comcast and the GMTC discussed the rate issues, the effective <br />competition proceeding, and the allegations of possible franchise violations, and <br />reached a comprehensive settlement of all outstanding issues. That settlement included <br />rate reductions and refund payments to Comcast customers and in return the GMTC <br />members withdrew their opposition to the effective competition proceeding. <br />If the City is interested in asking for a new ruling, the proceeding would be before the <br />FCC and would be an effort to reclaim the rate regulation authority revoked when <br />effective competition was found. A franchising authority wishing to assume jurisdiction <br />to regulate basic service and associated equipment must file a `Petition for <br />Recertification' accompanied by a copy of the earlier decision denying or revoking <br />certification. The petition must contain a clear showing, by affidavit or objectively <br />verifiable data, the reasons for the earlier finding of effective competition. <br />The threshold number the City would be looking at is 15% of the video customers in <br />Louisville currently subscribing to a video programmer other than Comcast. The City <br />asked legal counsel for the current satellite numbers to determine whether there would <br />be a case for a new petition. The information received established the City is at <br />14.23 %, which is below the 15% threshold. There are some variables, such as the <br />vacancy rates of 4.5 %, which would put the number at 14.9 %. <br />If the City chooses to file a petition for reconsideration, it is likely Comcast would <br />question those numbers. If the City chooses to proceed, staff estimates the cost of a <br />proceeding would be between $7,000 and $15,000. If the City was successful, one <br />question to address is how long would a new effective competition stand. The City of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.