My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2014 09 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2014 09 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:38 PM
Creation date
9/19/2014 12:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2014 09 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
value and the total property value. If the building value is a <br />relatively small portion of the total value, then the property is <br />probably not being used close to its full potential and rede- <br />velopment is likely. However, the improved value to property <br />value ratio is not an indicator of immediate development. <br />Many other factors unique to each property also influence <br />the likeliness of development. For example, if a property is <br />owned free and clear, without any debt, this analysis falls <br />short. <br />C4gitir '7°1 <br />- <br />Improvement values (50 %) of total Property Values <br />■ Improvement values (40 to 50 %) of total Property Values <br />■ improvement values (30 to 40 %) of total Property Values <br />■ improvement values ( >30 %) of total Property Values <br />Areas with Nigh Development Pressures <br />Areas with the highest development pressures are typically <br />vacant like some in the CTC and Centennial Valley; however, <br />many older under - developed properties are experiencing <br />significant reinvestment pressure along South Boulder Road <br />and within Old Town. <br />Staff mapped the allowed additional development in the City <br />with the building to property value ratio for all properties to <br />identify areas experiencing change today and that will likely <br />experience change in the future as the real estate market <br />recovers. <br />The majority of Louisville is stable; however, some specific ar- <br />eas are experiencing, or will likely experience, change. Down- <br />town, over the last few years, has experienced substantial <br />reinvestment to its building stock. The Old Town neighbor- <br />hood is also experiencing significant reinvestment with new <br />houses replacing many of the older homes. This analysis also <br />indicates large residential reinvestments may begin occurring <br />in neighborhoods outside of Old Town. New investments are <br />also occurring in the CTC, Steel Ranch, and North End. Ad- <br />ditional development requests are being submitted to the City <br />for property along South Boulder Road. <br />As a caveat, it is important to realize this analysis simply indi- <br />cates which areas of the City are likely to experienc change or <br />should anticipate future change. This analysis along with the <br />economic market study will indicate when change will likely <br />occur by land use type. The Comprehensive Plan will help <br />guide that change to the City's benefit. <br />Areas of Stability and Change <br />Areas of Stability <br />■ Areasof Incremental Change <br />Areas of Change <br />The Planning Context <br />I <br />.....___.../..,\_r......)1"--------- <br />4,2,1 s <br />2' <br />kr <br />2013 Comprehensive Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.