My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2014 09 23
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2014 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2014 09 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:52:11 AM
Creation date
10/14/2014 10:28:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2014 09 23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />OSAB ANNUAL REPORT <br />SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 <br />PAGE4OF5 <br />g. <br />ii. Options for right of first refusal or first offer <br />iii. Conservation trusts <br />iv. New partnerships <br />Ideas for expanding the role of Staff <br />i. Develop a tracking and relationship - building process for highly ranked <br />properties <br />ii. Monitor sales data and listings <br />iii. Establish options on and interests in key properties <br />h. Ideas for expanding the role of OSAB <br />i. Continue matrix process <br />ii. Provide input on proactive acquisition process <br />iii. Feedback on options and interests in key properties <br />Does Council see OSAB's role evolving in relation to Park acquisition and <br />operations decisions? (re: balancing Trust fund priorities for acquisition and <br />operations in OS and Parks) <br />Example: OSAB felt the Baptist Church property could well be a suitable <br />acquisition for park land, and the citizens at our meetings wanted our <br />advocacy, but OSAB had ranked that property as less desirable as Open <br />Space land. <br />How can we increase /improve lines of communication between Council <br />and OSAB? <br />Any changes to or guidance about OSAB's role in decision - making <br />processes with Council (strategic) and Staff (strategic and tactical)? <br />Would the Council be interested in brainstorming with OSAB on the vision for <br />Open Space and Parks in the future (20+ years out) and talking more about <br />ideas like: <br />o Trail Connectivity <br />o Caring for our Environment <br />o Focusing on Environmental, economic, and social health <br />o Priorities for protecting and conserving wildlife and habitat <br />o Developing Capital Exp. investment strategies /priorities <br />o Acquisition of buffers <br />o Investing in framework for volunteer opportunities <br />o Increasing education program offerings <br />o Staff development opportunities <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Continue open space budgeting and expenditure reporting and transparency in <br />Conservation Trust Fund public records <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.