My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 10 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
10/23/2014 12:54:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2014 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 25, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Watson asked for a motion for the alteration certificate. <br />Echohawk asked if we could continue this portion of the application. <br />Robinson stated yes. He reminded the board they are the final decision on the <br />alteration certificate. The applicant could go forward with the approvals of the grant and <br />landmark. <br />La Grave stated he would feel much more comfortable to have more eyes on the <br />alteration certificate and recommends a motion to move the item to the October 20th <br />meeting to have a chance to have more board members present. <br />Echohawk seconded the motion. <br />Robinson recommended the board give the applicant the option to request a <br />continuance on the landmarking. <br />Watson asked staff what would happen if there were a split vote. <br />Robinson stated the application for the alteration certificate would be denied. <br />La Grave asked to withdraw his motion for continuance. <br />The applicants were given a few moments to discuss amongst themselves how they <br />would like to proceed. <br />Johnson stated they would like to move forward with a continuance on the alteration <br />certificate. <br />Watson asked for another motion on the continuance. <br />La Grave made a motion for continuance. <br />Echohawk seconded the motion. <br />The motion for the continuance passed 3 to 1, with Watson voting no. <br />Robinson asked for a motion to amend Resolution No. 7 to remove the alteration <br />certificate. This will allow the resolution to be forwarded to Council without the alteration <br />certificate. <br />Discussion ensued to modify the resolution language. <br />Watson made a motion to approve Resolution No. 7 approving the landmarking <br />designation and grant approval, removing reference to alteration certificate. <br />Haley seconded the motion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.