My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1996 12 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1996 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1996 12 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:41 PM
Creation date
4/13/2004 10:44:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/17/1996
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1996 12 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />have a problem with a drive-in restaurant, ifit were landscadped and the cueing problem were solved. <br />He pointed out that signage and the look of the building were very important. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council move the preliminary Colony Square PUD on to the Planning Commission <br />with Council comments, seconded by Keany. All in favor with Howard being absent. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - PACIFICA II - CENTENNIAL VALLEY BUSINESS PARK - <br />PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the applicant proposed a 72,000 s.f two-story facility. <br />Landscape coverage was 35%. He stated that floor area ratio needed to be followed closely on <br />Parcel G, as this is the second to the last larger parcel in Parcel G. The number of parking spaces had <br />been increased from 276 to 316 spaces. The finish floor elevation is 6.5' higher than the elevation of <br />Century Place and approximately 1.5' to 2' lower than Century Drive to the north. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Ken Harshman, M+O+ A Architectural Partnership, gave a brief overview of the project. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br /> <br />Lathrop wanted to know why they went from three stories to two stories. <br /> <br />Harshman stated that after a market study they found that with the building costs and the rent that <br />they would have to generate to justify that was not feasible. They are also looking at some alternative <br />ideas for breaking the retaining wall into two components so it is not in a single step. They will be <br />working with the Phase I site. <br /> <br />Sisk was concerned about this being a "straight-line building". He wanted more interest in the front <br />architecture. <br /> <br />Mayer preferred the two story building. He agreed with Sisk as to wanting relief along the horizontal <br />architecture. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council forward the PUD to the Planning Commission with Council comments, <br />seconded by Lathrop. All in favor with Howard being absent. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1255, SERIES 1996 - AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF CITY OF <br />LOUISVILLE MONEY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A PARCEL OF LAND FOR OPEN <br />SPACE PURPOSES -1ST READING - SET PUBLIC HEARING 1/7/97 <br /> <br />Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No. 1255, Series 1996, "An ordinance authorizing the payment <br />of City of Louisville money for the acquisition ofa parcel ofland for open space purposes." <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.