City Council Minutes 1995 01 03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

because of the mixed uses of the buildings. He stated that they had addressed all of the concerns of the Goodhue Ditch Company regarding the construction of the underground ditch. They are granting an additional easement on the private land for access to the ditch company. Hartronfi stated that they are also going to incorporate Outlot C into Lot 101. Davidson called for Council comments. Sisk did not like the 40% overall that Hartronfi requested, which might cause problems down the road. He also did not like the signage. Howard was concerned with the lighting, foliage, more carnivorous trees, parking spaces, entry/exit, drainage, and signs. Hartronfi felt the landscaping was generous. They were proposing wall mounted lighting, as well, near the entrances to the buildings. They proposed intermittent 2' - 3' berming along South Boulder Road. He commented that detention ponds would be in the two parking areas, which would be released to South Boulder Road. Howard wanted the gazebo to be well lighted, so as not to be a temptation to the youths. He preferred fewer and slightly larger signs as opposed to more signs. He was concerned with the shared parking plan. Keany was concerned about the mixed-use, shared parking. Mayer wanted more camivorous trees and bushes, especially along South Boulder Road. He wanted the berm along South Boulder Road to be 3' tall and continuous, rather than intermittent. He did not want any spill-over of lighting. He wanted the restriction on medical/dental office percentage to be on the Plat and there be a requirement that the building owners provide a square footage amount yearly to the city. He also felt there should just be one sign. Lathrop stated that many of the concerns should have been handled at the Planning Commission level rather than being hashed out at the Council meeting. He felt the same way about the water and Recreation Center rates. He felt the staffs recommendation for signage was appropriate. Levihn was concerned about the placement of the signs and felt two signs with a higher berm would hide the buildings more, with carnivorous trees. He did not want the lighting to spill over onto the apartment complex behind this development. Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 73, Series 1995, with the following conditions: Allow one joint identification ground sign on South Boulder Road, with the location of the sign shown on the PUD Development Plan.