My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 01 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 01 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
1/13/2015 2:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2015 01 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1309 Grant — demolition of structure; subcommittee <br />architectural or social significance. <br />556 Lincoln — demolition of structure; subcommittee <br />architectural or social significance. <br />601 McKinley — replace the roof of the structure; subcommittee released the request <br />749 Main — replace windows; subcommittee released the request because the windows <br />were not historic. <br />Update on Alteration Certificate Requests — 1021 Jefferson <br />Trice stated the request to construct a new fence. The subcommittee released the <br />request. <br />Discussion /Comments on Planning Department Referrals — none <br />Updates — Preservation Master Plan— Subcommittee assignments <br />Trice stated subcommittee will act as advisors and meet with staff before each phase of <br />the plan. The plan has been divided into the following phases: <br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 15, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />released the request due to lack of <br />released the request due to lack of <br />• Vision purpose need phase <br />• City History and Program Evaluation <br />• Goal Policy Setting <br />• Implementation <br />Trice stated the final draft of the plan will be reviewed by the entire board. <br />Watson asked if all of the subcommittee meetings would be noticed just in case more <br />than two members show up. <br />Trice stated she originally intended on only two members but we can notify the meeting <br />if the board wishes to have more than two members present. <br />Stewart stated there are 4 phases and there are 7 board members so we will at least <br />two phases each. He stated he would be interested in the City History. <br />Echohawk stated she would be interested in the City History as well. <br />Watson stated he would be interested in the Goal Policy and Implementation. He <br />recommended having this discussion again in January. <br />Trice stated she needs to know about the Vision and Purposing first. <br />Fahey stated Haley and Stewart stated they wanted Visioning. She would like Goal <br />setting and Implementation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.