My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 01 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 01 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 7:48:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 01 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 20, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 18 <br />visitors. There were mixed feelings about more residential. The EnvisionLouisvilleCO <br />Web sites comments were as follows: Better bike and pedestrian connections; <br />automobile traffic is worse; varying opinions on development and lacking small town <br />character and sense of community. <br />At the kick -off meeting participants were given colored dots and asked to place green <br />dots on areas they liked, red dots on areas they disliked and blue dots for areas for <br />immediate change. <br />In the small group discussions participants discussed the following topics: Community <br />oriented businesses; Should be more of a destination; Better bike and pedestrian <br />connections; Not well integrated with Louisville; Acts as a barrier between <br />neighborhoods; Traffic and railroad impacts and better sense of community and small <br />town feel. All the information was included in the SWOT Analysis as follows: <br />COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br />Council member Keany inquired how the terms "internal" and "external" relate to the <br />strengths and weaknesses. Planner II Robinson explained the City has more control <br />over the internal factors, but not over the external factors. Planning and Building <br />Safety Director Russ explained the strengths are in the ownership of the parks, <br />pedestrian bike connections. The things the City does not own are either opportunities <br />or threats to the community. <br />Positive <br />Negative <br />Strengths <br />Weaknesses <br />• Parks and open space near <br />• Pedestrian and bike <br />Internal <br />corridor <br />• Physical form of the corridor <br />connections are lacking, <br />uninviting, and perceived as <br />(parcel sizes and rights -of- <br />unsafe <br />way) <br />• Conformity to community values <br />• Proximity to existing <br />• Aesthetic appearance of <br />neighborhood <br />corridor <br />• Connections to adjacent <br />neighborhoods <br />Opportunities <br />Threats <br />• Corridor as transportation <br />• Impact of the market and <br />External <br />link <br />regional competition on existing <br />• Shops, businesses, and <br />and desired land uses <br />services on corridor <br />• Traffic <br />• Valuable mix of uses on <br />• Train noise and impacts <br />corridor <br />• Lack of community consensus <br />on purpose of corridor <br />• Upkeep of existing buildings <br />COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br />Council member Keany inquired how the terms "internal" and "external" relate to the <br />strengths and weaknesses. Planner II Robinson explained the City has more control <br />over the internal factors, but not over the external factors. Planning and Building <br />Safety Director Russ explained the strengths are in the ownership of the parks, <br />pedestrian bike connections. The things the City does not own are either opportunities <br />or threats to the community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.