Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 6, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 18 <br />asked why it appears in the SWOT Analysis chart. Planning and Building Safety <br />Director Russ explained it appeared in the chart because it was a key question in all of <br />the stakeholders' interviews and in the community meeting. The question was which <br />core values are not present in the corridor and these four weaknesses were big items. <br />He noted these four are abstract and for each person to interpret and ultimately for <br />Council to interpret. He noted there was general consensus the four values were <br />lacking. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton cautioned South Boulder Road is a major arterial which is not <br />going away and as long as South Boulder Road runs through the area it will detract <br />from the perception of small town character. He suggested getting as close as possible <br />to small town character and still have a major arterial running through without <br />characterizing it as a nonconforming community value. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired about the blue dots on the map. Council member Stolzmann <br />explained the blue dots were the participants' desire for purchasing and acquiring open <br />space. <br />Mayor Muckle addressed the SWOT Analysis on conformity to community values and <br />voiced his belief they are not independent variables and would improve with pedestrian <br />connectivity, open space connections, parks and gathering places. He felt they would <br />be addressed in another part of the plan. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained the intent is to translate from the <br />abstract, the interpretation of what is a vision, to a principle base. There are six <br />principles and measures of success to balance the regional traffic needs of South <br />Boulder Road and Highway 42 with the community's desire for safety and accessibility. <br />Council member Stolzmann voiced her concern over Principles 2 and 5. Principle 2a) <br />(Allowed uses) and suggested more work on the principle definition. Planner II <br />Robinson stated more work would be done on the next phase (build -out analysis) of the <br />study. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained more will be known after <br />the results of the survey. <br />Council member Stolzmann addressed Principle 5 and reported on attending <br />community meetings and hearing the public talk about driving on South Boulder Road <br />and how they use the corridor. She felt Principle 5 is worded as a low priority for the <br />corridor. She suggested the principle be reworded for a driving /pedestrian use and to <br />mitigate traffic. Council member Loo agreed. <br />Planner II Robinson explained the principle tries to establish a balance between the <br />residential and regional needs for cars and pedestrians and bicyclists. Planning and <br />Building Safety Director Russ suggested flipping 5a) and 5b). He felt there was a lot <br />that could be done on South Boulder Road through land uses, which would create a <br />better balance. He noted the Planning Commission had the same concern. <br />