My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 02 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 02 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:08 PM
Creation date
2/13/2015 2:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 02 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 6, 2015 <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />Mayor Muckle requested a staff presentation. <br />Public Works Director Kowar updated Council on the options available regarding the <br />crosswalk at the McCaslin /Washington intersection. Since the opening of the <br />underpass, there have been numerous discussions regarding the necessity of the at- <br />grade crossing and concern that maintaining the crosswalk creates an unsafe condition. <br />Many comments received by the City have been to remove the crosswalk and direct <br />pedestrians to the newly constructed underpass. <br />The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) suggests this intersection <br />should be marked with a crosswalk. It is important to follow the MUTCD to create <br />consistent traffic control throughout the City. Unique, customized solutions confuse <br />motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians. Staff is concerned that a non - standard solution at <br />the McCaslin and Washington intersection would establish an inappropriate precedent <br />suggesting pedestrians crossings in similar situations elsewhere need to be <br />discouraged from crossing when they have the legal right to cross. <br />He asked if the City should remove the crosswalk marking and install warning signs <br />advising the use of the underpass. The crosswalk could give a false sense of security <br />and lead to more people using it instead of the underpass. Or, should the City leave the <br />crosswalk marking in place and install warning signs. Some people will still cross and <br />the warning signs would alert drivers they may encounter pedestrians and be prepared <br />to yield. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Terre Rushton, 671 W. Ash Street, Louisville, CO stated she originally opposed the <br />underpass because of the expense, but she is now a proponent. She stated it is not <br />about urban planning or about making Louisville more pedestrian /bicyclist friendly or <br />how to mark the intersection, it is about safety. The City Council constructed the <br />underpass because they felt it was the safest way to provide a crossing for pedestrians <br />or bicyclists. There was discussion of a traffic signal at the intersection however the <br />City staff was opposed because the steep grade on McCaslin would make it difficult for <br />northbound traffic to stop in icy or wet conditions. The underpass is well designed, well - <br />lit and provides a safe crossing. She referred to CDOT research on crosswalks, which <br />indicate when traffic volumes and speed increase at a marked intersection, pedestrian <br />accidents increase more at marked crosswalks than unmarked crosswalks. She stated <br />the speed limit on McCaslin is 40 mph and noted traffic volumes have increased <br />because many drivers are using McCaslin to avoid traffic congestion on US 36. She <br />stated the question of do we want a marked crosswalk or not, should instead be the <br />most effective measure to help pedestrians cross the street. Crosswalks are not <br />considered safety devices and are not used to stop traffic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.