My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 02 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 02 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:08 PM
Creation date
2/13/2015 2:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 02 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 20, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 18 <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO addressed warning <br />signs and stated they would only be effective if they were large and dramatic. He did not <br />feel this crosswalk affects any other crosswalk in the city. He recommended directional <br />signs to the underpass. He agreed the underpass is well designed and well lit. He did <br />not agree with the principle that the intersection is intended to improve safety for any <br />pedestrian /bicyclists and noted the City will never stop people from crossing McCaslin. <br />He felt marking the crosswalk is an invitation for people to cross McCaslin and the City <br />should remove the invitation. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Loo stated she also uses the intersection twice a day and noted in the <br />last snow storm the underpass was icy and dangerous so she used the crosswalk <br />because McCaslin was clear. She suggested alternative signage to alert pedestrians <br />they are crossing at your own risk and point them to the underpass. Public Works <br />Director Kowar stated such signage could be considered as one of the alternatives. <br />Staff is trying to embrace standards, but it is a pedestrian /bicyclists choice. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ stated it is also about motorist awareness. <br />This intersection is a major destination and pedestrians and bicyclists like the line of <br />sight. The crosswalk alerts motorists a pedestrian may be present. <br />Council member Lipton stated there are sidewalks which take pedestrians to the <br />crosswalk. He suggested there should some physical changes and better signage to <br />encourage pedestrians to use the underpass. He addressed the speed of traffic and <br />suggested speed enforcement and physical improvements to the sidewalk flow. <br />Council member Stolzmann was not in favor of re- painting the crosswalk. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton was in favor of eliminating the crosswalk. He suggested signage <br />directing pedestrians to the underpass. <br />Council member Keany was in favor of eliminating the crosswalk. He felt it was an <br />invitation to cross at that intersection. <br />Council member Leh was in favor of eliminating the crosswalk. He felt it would be <br />better to encourage the public to use the underpass. <br />Council member Loo did not support eliminating the sidewalks. She felt people will then <br />make a social path. <br />There was Council consensus to eliminate the crosswalk and encourage pedestrians to <br />use the underpass. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.