My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1990 06 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1990 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1990 06 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:31 PM
Creation date
2/18/2008 1:28:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/5/1990
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1990 06 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and how many signs will be placed <br />on the weekends and submit it to <br />council far approval, but until <br />then the sign code will stay in <br />effect . <br />Sackett moved that unless we <br />receive a request to change the <br />sign ordinance, that we follow the <br />ordinance as is and if the sign <br />companies would like to present a <br />plan to and meet with concerned <br />council members about this that <br />they be allowed to do so, if there <br />is not a request we enforce the <br />code or change it, seconded by <br />Hornbostel. By Roll Call Vote <br />Motion Passed 4-3 with Carnival, <br />Szymanski and Mayor Fauson eating <br />no. <br />Carnival stated his no vote was a <br />means of 1 ending support to the <br />developers and the businesses in an <br />effort to allow them some marketing <br />tool. If we are going to take a <br />stand on this ordinance we need to <br />take a stand on all the ordinances <br />that are in place. <br />Mayor Fauson agreed with Carnival. <br />Howard stated he voted yes because <br />if the ordinance needs to be <br />changed then lets change it. <br />UPDATE - TRANSPORTATION COALITION COMMITTEE <br />Franklin stated that city staff and <br />Boulder County staff have been <br />working together to arrive at some <br />methods and facts to support your <br />policy decisions regarding Boulder <br />County Transportation Coalition in <br />the future. At this point we have <br />arrived at a number of <br />transportation model scenarios that <br />would allow us to use DRCOG <br />transportation. Depending upon how <br />the Coalition divides the balance <br />amongst the jurisdictions, <br />Louisville may be asked to <br />contribute up to $10,000. <br />Davidson asked how the cost was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.