Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 02 12

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 8, 2015 Page 17 of 23 Tengler says that his concern of little too specific in conforming in matching. This better reflects his view. In the email from Mr. Vinall, he suggested that "conforms" is a better choice of words. Russell says that "reflects" is a good term because it acknowledges the fact that we cannot control everything and we cannot commit to everything that we are asked to do. Pritchard states he likes the word "reflects" as well. Staff has found an appropriate word. Russell discusses a)b) Allow flexibility for changes in market requirements, design trends, and creativity in design. He states that "allows flexibility to respond to changes in market requirements ". Tengler and Pritchard agree with the changes Russell. Robinson says he will change the wording to "allows flexibility to respond to changes." Principle 4 had no changes. Principle 5 with additions. No comments. Principle 6 with additions. Public Comment: Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, Louisville, C 27. She discusses the incorporation of the public in. . it pert SWOT report. She attended the public hearing fo OR • Question #1 - How do you use South Boulder properties and amenities. How • m d you like to commun how • Question #2 — What do you thi along the corridor and as the co values should be incorporated int the Small Ar- . . n and the ctober 8, 2014. idor and its surrounding t in the future? Q lues identified in the Comp Plan think the core community She has papers of handw public and Boards and question #1 and 99 t appearance of the the 277 responses, or better landscaping, most attra a' - "wan how the they are more readable for the 'sville. Th- a were 178 responses to wed the comments concerning the weakness as reported in the SWOT. From ining to appearance and they listed more n open space. 2 of the 6 said "not the a more • - : 'part of the neighborhood." She fails to see arance were given so much weight in the SWOT. She quests with the South Boul creation of a s along the corrido e a compilation It was a total o ing Departme oad as a n own fe st mentioned comments by the public on these two of the responses which seemed to be in general agreement conclusions about lack of bike and pedestrian friendliness, south barrier that is difficult to traverse especially for students, the road, and desire for fiscal responsibility and low density She is confused abou a lack of community consensus on desires. There is a lot of information and she would encourage the PC review of this document which is included at the end of the PC agenda for December 2014. She gives her input on the changing of the word "conform to public opinion" as far as proposing changes along the corridor. She thinks "strongly reflects" or "consistent with" public opinion are good alternatives as we are a government of and by the people and citizen wishes for our community must be incorporated into City decisions. At this public meeting in October, she heard Staff say that the font of the signage on the announcements which are now again on South Boulder Road is too small. People have