Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2015 <br />Page 18 of 23 <br />mentioned that as you drive by, they simply cannot read it. She hopes the problem can be <br />corrected before the next Small Area Plan or the McCaslin Small Area Plan. <br />Tengler asks Morgan a question. Relative to aesthetics and bike planning, do you mean to imply <br />there is more or less emphasis on either of them? <br />Morgan answers regarding appearance, she doesn't know why it is a negative as there were <br />few negative comments about it. <br />Russell asks about definition of "small town character ". What does that mean to her? <br />Morgan answers that in the responses, people said "small town character ". It has not been fully <br />identified and as a community, it should be explored and defined. <br />Moline asks if she thinks the current corridor has a small town charac <br />Morgan answers she thinks it could be improved upon, which inclu• - .rks and walkability, <br />biking pathways, and strengths mentioned in the exercise. She the exercise was a <br />valuable tool and hopes it will be used on the McCaslin Small $ ®. n. <br />Moline wants clarification from Russ regarding "corridor" a ° d- .n of it. Moline's <br />definition is it is not just the street, but the properties tha o the stre° - d extend back. Is this <br />correct? <br />Russ answers yes. <br />Cindy Bedell, 662 West Willow Street, Louisville, <br />Resident in Louisville for 19 years. She thinks it is <br />constituents and not be carried away with planning. <br />what the majority of them want. She i -. •y to see the <br />communication and input. Her other i • - . is that th <br />favor turning the South Boulder Road c® .o . - igh <br />small town character, her neighbors app <br />plans for urbanization. Her o•' 'on is that <br />are what make Louisville She thi <br />rtant to listen to e <br />nts should be considered and <br />ach being conducted for <br />rity of the constituents do not <br />rban corridor. Regarding the <br />Tway as far as possible <br />ds and spacious setbacks <br />nts agree with her and would <br />not be in support of d <br />not want a 3 -story f <br />Walnut Street in B <br />density buildings. Sh <br />initiated this •_'_ e towar <br />with ze <br />roof su <br />e charac <br />"Ile w <br />other <br />ery short setbacks. Many residents also do <br />what is being built on Canyon Street and <br />f Boulder has been changed by these high <br />to go in that direction. She wonders who <br />ed by constituents or constituent feedback? <br />Paula <br />She <br />part' <br />She thi <br />for South <br />and what the <br />r, 16 <br />prised to se <br />d in the Octob <br />®er 100 peopl <br />er Road. Sh <br />re of thos <br />on <br />rive, Louisville, CO <br />`lac . .mmunity consensus on desires" added to the study. She <br />blic ° ' g and there was extraordinary consensus in the room. <br />re pre ° nt. There was a well expressed consensus on the vision <br />ants to know where the additional comments have come from <br />mments are. <br />Pritchard answers ..' ing at the packet, while there were people participating in the open <br />forums, the discuss! . th property owners were not necessarily in line with the community <br />wants. There can be a disconnect" with property owners who have vested rights in the <br />community. <br />Palmer responds that citizens are also property owners. She wonders if these property owners <br />were contacted separately and not a part of the October community event? <br />Pritchard answers that these property owners were present but did not feel they could give full <br />disclosure. There is more information in the packet. <br />Palmer asks what the opportunities are for the different segments of the community to talk <br />openly with each other. <br />Pritchard answers that the Planning Commission meeting is part of the process. <br />