Laserfiche WebLink
.Mayor Fauson: I would recommend to extend 96th to Highway 42. <br />Phare: I can draft a letter stating with the activity <br /> with Interlocken and the City of Broomfield we <br /> would recommend extending 96th to Highway 42. We <br /> can state that the link should be a higher priori- <br />ty. <br />Davidson: Under the Minor Widening Project, I would <br /> recommend that Item number 2 be moved to be Item <br /> number 1. <br />Phare: Felt the same and if done this would serve us the <br /> best and the citizens of the Louisville the best <br /> . <br />I will recommend that Item 2 is a higher priority <br /> for us. I will draft a letter with the <br /> recommendations that you have given me and will <br /> keep you informed. <br />RESOLUTION X26, SERIES 1990 - CORNERSTONE SUBDIVISION - FINAL <br />DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT - COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />Read by title only, "Resolution No. 26, Series <br />1990 - A Resolution approving a Final PUD <br />Development Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for <br />Cornerstone Subdivision." <br />Franklin: The purpose of the request is to allow development <br />of 71 single family detached dwelling upon lots <br />which on average, exceed 7100 square feet in area. <br />The project will also include perimeter <br />landscaping. Access to the project will be from <br />Via Appia; emergency access will be available to <br />McCaslin Blvd. Typically we recommend that a <br />subdivision have two points of access, however, <br />due to topographical constraints and traffic <br />constraints we were unable to do that. <br />Tom Hoyt, McStain Enterprises, 75 Manhattan Drive, Boulder, <br />Colorado. <br />Hoyt: At this time a brief presentation was given and <br />slides were also presented. We have met with the <br />neighbors of the Wildridge Subdivision and have <br />addressed their concerns and have redesigned the <br />subdivision at the far end. <br />Mayor Fauson asked if there was anyone that would like to speak <br />in favor of or in opposition to this resolution. None. <br />Szymanski: Why is it impossible to have two regular accesses? <br />Franklin: We have reviewed this very carefully with regard <br />3 <br />