My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1990 08 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1990 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1990 08 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:32 PM
Creation date
2/18/2008 1:34:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/21/1990
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1990 08 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
one voluntary. Also in the RFPs give an idea of what it would <br />cost the average citizen for them to participate in a mandatory <br />program and then what it would cost if it was voluntary for the <br />city to supplement the program. Also in the RFP how will this <br />affect the rates in Louisville. Council will also review <br />commercial at a later date. The hauler is to pay for all the <br />expenses and they can make whatever revenue they can make. <br />L. OTHER REGULAR BUSINESS ITEMS ARISING AFTER PREPARATION OF <br />AGENDA <br />Davidson moved to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute <br />the contract draft dated August 10, 1990 for our interim city <br />attorney, seconded by Howard. All in favor. Motion passed. <br />Howard: There is great concern in Ward I and Ward II about <br />the proposed shopping complex on Davidson Mesa <br />area. I would like to get a global city view of <br />what is necessary to be done and I felt that this <br />would be done through the water billing. Although <br />this issue has not come up, if this developer <br />comes in he will know that the city is not going <br />to go for it or the city will go for it or nobody <br />wants anything on that mesa. I would like to be <br />fair to all parties involved. <br />Howard moved to use city staff to prepare an informal survey of <br />the citizens using the water bill which will ask the population <br />of Louisville whether or not they voted and are they for or <br />against any development on the mesa. <br />Sackett: Hoped that petitioners would wait until the <br />developer has had a chance to present the <br />development. <br />Council felt that the developer should have talked to the city <br />before talking to the press. Council also felt that each <br />developer should be given due process and given a fair hearing. <br />Howard withdrew his motion with the hopes that the Planning <br />Commission is not deluged with a premature petition until the <br />person has had a chance to present his case. If the case is bad <br />then the case will be voted down. <br />Sackett: Felt it was going to be hard for the developer to <br />get anything because he did not follow due <br />process. <br />Hornbostel: Did not feel the petitioners would bring petitions <br />in until they felt it necessary. <br />Mayor Fauson: This group ~iid hold the city's feet to the fire <br />some time ago on land acquisition. They were not <br />very cooperative and I don't look forward to <br />myself being too cooperative with those people <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.