My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1990 11 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1990 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1990 11 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:32 PM
Creation date
2/18/2008 1:46:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
11/6/1990
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1990 11 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
indicates a significant variance. The $595 <br />difference between the Case Power Equipment quote <br />with the noted variances and the Honnen Equipment <br />Company quote without variance indicates that the <br />John Deere is a much better value and it fully <br />complies with specifications. Funds for the <br />purchase have been identified as coming from <br />Council contingency. We are recommending that <br />Council award the bid for the Public Works <br />Department front end loader to Honnen Equipment <br />Company in the amount of $73,688 (includes trade <br />in on existing loader} for a John Deere 624EH <br />loader. <br />Howard moved to award the front end loader to Honnen Equipment <br />Company in the amount of $73,688 ( which includes trade in on the <br />existing loader) for a John Deere 624EH loader. All in favor. <br />DISCUSSION/ACTION - EXCLUSION FROM THE CHERRYVALE FIRE PROTECTION <br />DIST. - CITY OF LOUISVILLE, LINCOR AND HOMART <br />Brand: On October 24, 1990 the following people met in my <br />office to discuss the requested exclusion from the <br />Cherryvale Fire Protection District: Carey Crain, <br />Don Shonkwiler, Kathy O'Neill and Sharon Miller, <br />Kevin K1 ein and Dave Chaffin and myself . We <br />agreed to recommend to our respective governing <br />bodies that we proceed in the following manner: <br />proceed file an appeal under 32-1-501 and request <br />the Board of County Commissioners to hold the <br />apeal in obeyence for ninety days while we negoti- <br />ate a process under 32-1-502. If it is not possi- <br />ble to come up with a joint plan under 31-1-502, <br />we can then either ask the County Commissioners to <br />take the petitioners' appeal from abeyance and <br />hear it with our knowledge that, should they deny <br />the petitioners' appeal, the next appeal would be <br />to District Court; or we can present separate <br />plans to District Court, one from the petitioners <br />and one from Cherryvale and let the District Court <br />put together a plan. <br />Howar: What would the potential cost of the appeal be. <br />Griffiths: Because of the time frame for filing the appeal <br />(due tomorrow}, to prepare the documents, we spent <br />about 5-6 hours total; we will not bill the city <br />for this time if the Council decides not to au- <br />thorize us to file the appeal. <br />Brand: Also stated that the Cherryvale Fire District <br />would like to see the policy with regard to annex- <br />ing to the City of Louisville and who provides <br />fire protection service. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.