Laserfiche WebLink
Howard: I would suggest that question be gut to them <br />before having a work session with them, so that <br />they can think about it befare. I would like to <br />get a time frame on this. <br />Mayor Fauson: The overall concept, I have no problem with except <br />for the use of the Superior Interchange over to <br />95th. I would not want that to be incorporated in <br />there. I think for the resolution we should stick <br />to basics. I am not sure how to do that. I would <br />like to see it kept as simple as possible. <br />Hornbostel: I would like to go back the questions that I had. <br />Can we support the concept of it using existing <br />roads and open space to support the infrastructure <br />going to the airport? If we can agree to that, we <br />can put that in. Would we be willing to support <br />the use of IGA's to ensure proper land use and <br />planning? Would we willing to work with the County <br />in providing parkway easements and setbacks? At <br />this point I think they were trying to get the <br />idea from us whether we were willing to work with <br />them or not. Whether we can support the concept. <br />Sackett: The IGA's that were mentioned would be used for <br />all the things that were listed before, and to <br />ensure limited access and proper speeds? <br />Hornbostel: Yes, points of access. The idea is to make is <br />fair for everyone. This is going to be a give and <br />take situation. <br />Sackett: I think we should have in there direct information <br />relating to 96th and 42. I also think Dillon Road <br />should be improved to where the developers improve <br />it, from 88th to 96th. Also I am concerned with <br />287 and Dillon Road. Airport access is important. <br />It is important that people be able to come from <br />the airport to Louisville. If we are not careful, <br />Broomfield will make sure that you always have to <br />deal with 287 in order to get to Louisville. I <br />think we need to sit down with Broomfield about <br />this issue. We need to sit down with the cities <br />in this area and talk about limited access and how <br />to maintain the speeds. <br />Hornbostel: Felt that was too specific for the resolution, but <br />was probably some of the points that would have to <br />be worked out at the work session. <br />Davidson: Agreed with Sackett that IGA's on the subjects <br />that have been mentioned should be part of the <br />whole package. I wonder if the resolution we can <br />have here, could be same general statement of <br />support. <br />8 <br />