My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2015 03 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2015 03 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:24 AM
Creation date
3/13/2015 8:35:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSABPKT 2015 03 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />February 11th 2015 <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />Issue #3: "Fairness" <br />According to documentation provided to the board, there are currently 30 memorial benches on Louisville <br />Open Space land, and staff recommends allowing up to 19 more. At that point, presumably the program <br />will be finished indefinitely. The reason for capping the program is to keep the land from filling up with <br />benches. To me this suggests a system that is inherently unfair. The benches will only be available to <br />families in a short window (the next 5 -10 years ?) and unavailable to future generations. My fear is that at <br />some point the city will started to field complaints about this and experience pressure to allow more <br />benches. What if citizens want to commemorate a beloved community member, such as a teacher or a city <br />leader, and collect signatures to petition the City Council? We are tasked with maintaining the city's Open <br />Space in perpetuity, and it is likely that there will always be requests to relax the memorial bench program's <br />bench maximum cap. <br />Alternatives /Proposals: <br />As I see it, there are two general ways forward. The first is to continue the memorial bench program as <br />currently proposed by Open Space staff including a total bench count cap. But if this is the choice, I <br />would strongly advocate a Rules and Regulation document (analogous to that of the cemetery) that <br />specifies: <br />1) A specified maximum period for an individual to reserve the right to maintain an engraving /plaque on a <br />certain bench, such as 20 years. <br />2) A statement that says while the city will maintain the bench itself, the memorial components, such as the <br />engravings /plaque, will not be guaranteed against "acts of god," including vandalism. <br />3) Items such as stones, shells, beads, toys, plantings, flower pots, baskets, candles, etc. may not be used <br />and shall be removed. <br />Furthermore, I believe the cost of staff time needs to be included in the price of the benches. The benches <br />are a finite commodity and probably undervalued at the current rate. I would advocate a significant cost <br />increase. Memorial benches should not be seen as a cheaper, but otherwise comparable, alternative to a <br />grave- marker. <br />The second way forward, which I prefer, is to eliminate the Open Space memorial bench program. If the <br />city wants more benches on Open Space, I believe that the city should fund them from the general fund, <br />rather than through an unfair and piecemeal process. Current benches would remain, but no further <br />applications would be accepted. <br />That said, Louisville citizens love their Open Space and their desire to be memorialized with it speaks to a <br />connection to the land and the city that is special and worth celebrating. I propose that, rather than a bench <br />program, the city establish some other way of marking citizens' love for and connection to the land. My <br />idea is to have either an inscribed - bricks plaza on the sidewalk or a low wall of inscribed - bricks either at <br />Harper or Davidson. The wall could be functional, such as covering a retaining wall or the wing walls of <br />the underpass. Citizens could buy a brick as a Friend of Open Space, and inscribe it with their name or "in <br />memory of." The money raised from the bricks could be used in the Open Space and Parks Fund or in a <br />smaller fund dedicated solely to education and outreach. It is my belief that many of the people who are <br />currently buying memorial benches could be satisfied with the a less expensive memorial brick, which <br />would be cheaper and easier for the city to maintain. The program would be more fair, as it would need no <br />upper maximum count; when the first plaza or wall is full, the city could create another at Hecla Lake, etc. <br />By concentrating the markers at trailheads, we would also avoid the aesthetic issues of too many memorial <br />benches. If a family or group is adamant about putting a memorial on City-owned Open Space land, it <br />should require a petition to the City Council and be open to public review and comment. That way, <br />citizens who believe that Open Space is being over - populated with memorials can be heard. <br />Sincerely, <br />Laura Scott Denton <br />687 Tamarisk Ct., Louisville <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.