My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 03 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 03 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:30:13 AM
Creation date
3/27/2015 9:13:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2015 03 12
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 12, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br />McCartney answers that the initial submittal was for 108 apartment units and 5 townhomes and <br />21,000 SF commercial. During the review process, McClure increased the overall apartment <br />units and increased the commercial. <br />Rice asks about Building D being one story. He clarifies that it is located to the north of the <br />South Street area and not adjacent to the transition zone. This end of the building is where the <br />roof - mounted sign will be located. The sign will be lower than the adjacent building. <br />McCartney answers yes. <br />Rice clarifies that the parking provided in this plan exceeds all design standards. <br />McCartney answers yes. <br />Rice asks about the Public Works City Engineer memo that discusses a much higher level of <br />maintenance for Cannon Street. Rice asks if the PC approves the motion as suggested, will this <br />issue be worked out before the City Council gets it. <br />Russ answers that the City is working out details on the Woonerf as well as the public spaces. <br />The developer is committed to snow plow the Woonerf but the City will plow Cannon leading to <br />the Woonerf. <br />Brauneis asks about the Historical Preservation Board's reaction to the demolition of the three <br />buildings. <br />McCartney answers during the preliminary PUD, the HPB stated that if a building is worthy of <br />retention, that it should be retained on site. During Phase 1 and 1A, the developer agreed to <br />save the "most character" building at 1004 Griffith. It is currently on site and ready to be placed. <br />The HPB also wanted more "nod" to the history of the area and the applicant is naming the <br />Nawatny Greenway for Louis Nawatny who helped create Louisville and Caledonia Plaza which <br />is the one of the original subdivisions in this area. <br />Brauneis asks about the open space that is City -owned but rr ntained by the developer. Are <br />there examples currently existing in the City? <br />McCartney says that in Steel Ranch, theree similt re common in newer <br />developments. <br />Brauneis asks if the City will cover the water expenses for ii'igation of the spaces. How <br />much say does the City have species selection? <br />McCartney says this proposal went through Horticultural and Forestry Advisory Board (HFAB). <br />They have seen the initial design but they wish t o e the final construction drawings to <br />determine if species are compatible with the area <br />Brauneis asks about the primary path for bike travel north to south. Is it Cannon in the <br />Woonerf? , <br />McCartney says the Woonerf is being created as a multi -modal pedestrian and bicycle area. <br />Russ says that the design of the Woonerf is "self- enforced ". All local streets are 25 mph. <br />Because of its design, it can be lower speed. Staff will work with Public Works to find unique <br />identifiers. Cannon is in the Woonerf to provide the north and south route. The Highway 42 <br />Plan will have an 8' crushed fine trail on the eastern edge from South Boulder Road to Pine, and <br />on the west side, there will be a 6' to 8' sidewalk, as well as bike lanes on Highway 42. There <br />was not enough room for a bike trail along the train corridor. <br />Brauneis asks about the light from the roof - mounted sign and where it is directed? <br />McCartney says the applicant can answer the question. Russ answers that if the sign is <br />installed, it will need to follow the lighting standards in the Downtown Sign Manual, which allows <br />neon, backlit, or halo lighting as well as indirect lighting. No cabinet sign or internally lit sign. <br />Brauneis asks about the off -site water drainage and restoration of the Nawatny Greenway. <br />McCartney says that when the regional drainage is built, it will be located near the current shop <br />building off Empire. Once it is completed, there will be no need for on -site drainage for this <br />project. The Nawatny Greenway will be constructed as a manicured area with walks and <br />appropriate grades. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.