My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 04 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 04 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:26 AM
Creation date
4/20/2015 12:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2015 04 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Staff Report <br />April 9, 2015 <br />The study area for the project is along South Boulder Road from Via Appia to the east <br />City limits with Lafayette, and Highway 42/96th Street from Coal Creek Station to the <br />north City limits at Paschal Drive. This planning effort is divided into five phases: desire, <br />discovery, design, discussion, and documentation. <br />1. Desire — Use community outreach to solicit and document the community's <br />expectations for the corridor and identify specific measures of success (character <br />traits, fiscal performance, transportation system effectiveness, etc.) that will be <br />used ensure those expectations are met; <br />2. Discover— Analyze the corridor and document the existing performance (zoning <br />build out, fiscal performance, transportation performance) of the corridor to <br />establish a baseline for future comparisons; <br />3. Design — Outline, with community input, alternative land use and infrastructure <br />scenarios for consideration by the community; <br />4. Discussion — Test and refine alternative land use and infrastructure scenarios with <br />the community and develop a preferred land use and infrastructure scenario (the <br />Small Area Plan); <br />5. Documentation — Translates the Small Area Plan into zoning amendments and <br />potentially design overlays incorporated into the Louisville Municipal Code. <br />We are now at the culmination of the "Design" phase of the project, and staff is seeking <br />Planning Commission approval of the three land use alternatives that have been <br />developed through the process. Each land use alternative describes what uses or mix of <br />uses will be allowed on parcels in the study area, rough locations for parks or green <br />space, and in general how tall buildings can be. The alternatives also include projected <br />build out for retail, office, and residential uses. <br />Staff is requesting Planning Commission review and revise the alternatives as needed, <br />then endorse them. Once Planning Commission has endorsed the alternatives, staff will <br />present them to City Council for review and endorsement. After endorsement, staff and <br />consultants will evaluate the three alternatives against the previously endorsed <br />measures of success. Those results will be presented to the public to define the <br />preferred alternative. <br />Alternatives <br />Staff and consultants analyzed the corridor to identify areas likely to change based on <br />market pressures in the next 20 years. These areas were mapped for two reasons: 1) <br />these properties are allowed more development in zoning than is currently built; and /or, <br />2) the value of the buildings on these properties is less than 30% of the combined total <br />property and building value. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.