Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 21, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />$24,000 per year from Xcel for reducing loads on the electrical grid. Additionally, federal <br />tax incentives may be converted to a one time grant and are available to the private <br />sector. In order to capture the additional tax incentives, as well as the allowable <br />equipment depreciation tax deduction, the equipment must be owned by a private <br />sector entity. In order to qualify for the most favorable tax incentives it is necessary to <br />incur before the end of 2010 expenses for specific equipment or activities in excess of <br />5% of the project. This is known as the "safe harbor requirement." <br />Public Works Director Phare reviewed several graphs, which outlined the savings over <br />the fife of the. system. When all the rebates and credits are factored in, and assuming <br />the cost of electricity increases at an average rate of 4% per year, the 20 -year life -cycle <br />cost of the project would be roughly the same as continuing to purchase electricity from <br />Xcel. If the solar PV system lasts longer than 20 years, it could eventually offset the <br />City's cost of purchasing electrical power by as much as $24,000 per year over the <br />remaining life of the system. If the cost of electricity increases by an average of more <br />than 4% over the next 20 years, the project would break even faster, but, if the cost of <br />electricity increases by less than an average of 4% over the next 20 years, the project <br />would save relatively little when compared with buying electricity directly from Xcel. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO did not support staff's <br />recommendations for the solar project for the three City's utility plants. He felt there are <br />many uncertainties over a 20 -year period and urged Council to reject the resolutions. <br />John Dallapiazza, Bella Energy, 400 S. Arthur Avenue, Suite 500, Louisville, CO <br />presented graphs illustrating the cumulative savings for installing solar panels at the <br />City's utility plants. He noted the present incentives are as good as they get. <br />R.G. Harrington, 457 E. Raintree Court, Louisville, CO noted the uncertainty of fossil <br />fuel used to fuel energy plants. He explained Peabody Coal will close their Colorado <br />coal mines in the next five years and the coal fields in Wyoming will be exhausted in ten <br />years. He reviewed clean air legislation, which will provide a regulatory process. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Councilor Dalton voiced his opposition to the solar power proposal. He supported <br />conserving energy, but felt the solar project was not a good use of taxpayer's money. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella voiced her support for the proposal and her belief the pay back <br />would be less than twenty years. She questioned whether Bella Energy could <br />guarantee installation by the deadline. John Dallapiazza stated the six month period is <br />enough time to install and implement the project. He noted Bella Energy added a <br />penalty clause to the agreement, should they not be able to deliver on time. <br />