Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 5, 2015 <br />Page 15 of 33 <br />Carson Bise, TischlerBise, Fiscal, Economic and Planning Consultants, reviewed the <br />objectives of the City's RFP as follows: <br />1. Develop a marginal -cost fiscal impact model to demonstrate the impact of land <br />development applications. Estimate City -wide fiscal impacts associated with <br />various land use scenarios developed as part of any Comprehensive Plan <br />Update, or Small Area Planning process; <br />2. City will use to model land use and development scenarios. Evaluate the <br />municipal fiscal impacts anticipated with various proposed individual land <br />development applications; <br />3. Reflect current capacities of City departments. Clarify the City's levels of service <br />during City Council goal setting, budgeting, and long -range staffing analysis. <br />Account for different financing scenarios and be easy to update. <br />TischlerBise was asked to create two models, one marginal cost model for City -wide <br />planning and budgeting, and one average cost hybrid model for evaluating individual <br />development proposals and reviewed the City's objective. <br />Fiscal Impact Models are project based on the following: Geographic location; <br />Timing /phasing of new development; Density; Physical development pattern; Road <br />network and transportation choices. A Citywide Fiscal Impact Model also includes <br />intervention strategies and cumulative effect of development decisions. <br />Application Design: Developed in Excel and Visual Basic allows for a powerful and <br />flexible application; easily modified; additional modules can be integrated at a later date. <br />Transparent structure avoids "black box" concerns such as Data, assumptions, <br />algorithms fully shown. <br />Application Design: Land Use /Scenario Input Module: Development projects and <br />growth scenarios are represented through demographic inputs; unlimited number of <br />land use categories can be reflected and be designed to reflect multiple subareas (fiscal <br />analysis zones). <br />Capital Facilities: Option to have the model forecast the need for capital facilities or <br />enter facilities directly; recognize unused capacities and /or determine growth's <br />proportionate share of the costs; build new additions; lag /lead time of construction; <br />financing mechanisms and repurchase after useful life. <br />Operating Expenses: Can be organized by department or program area; reflects <br />program - related operating expenses versus facility - related operating expenses; — <br />forecasts staff and related expenses; ability to factor one -time costs and ability to factor <br />fixed costs. <br />46 <br />