Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 5, 2015 <br />Page 25 of 33 <br />following: 1/1 wall sign at 24 inches in height; 3 monument signs 12 feet tall and 60SF <br />in area. Staff did not support the sign waivers as presented. <br />Landscaping: MUDDSG requires 20% landscape coverage. Applicant is proposing <br />10% landscape coverage. Staff acknowledges the reduction of landscaping allows for <br />more flexible internal circulation and future land use. Staff required the following: Work <br />with the City Forester and Parks Project Manager to save as many trees as possible. <br />Staff also required the parking on the east, along Hwy 42 be removed and replaced with <br />a landscape buffer. This will increase the overall landscaping by 3,500 SF or 3% over <br />the entire property. <br />Architecture and Building Design: 35 feet is allowed, 26'3" proposed. Two stories are <br />allowed to promote mixed use on top, one -story is proposed. <br />Special Review Use: This property is proposed to be used as City parking lot. Staff <br />believed the criterion of the Special Review Use has been met. <br />Waivers: Staff supported the site plan waivers as long as the parking along Hwy 42 is <br />removed and replaced with landscaping and an east /west pedestrian connection is <br />created. Staff did not support the sign waivers. Staff supported the parking waiver if <br />the applicant agrees to a parking agreement for Miner's Field and replaces Hwy 42 <br />parking with landscaping /tree preservation. <br />Recommendation: Staff recommended approval of the requested rezoning, final plat, <br />final PUD and SRU for DELO Plaza, with the six conditions prior to recordation of the <br />plat at Planning Commission. The applicant did not accept staff conditions at that <br />meeting. The Planning Commission reviewed the application without conditions on <br />March 12th. The Planning Commission concluded the proposed PUD was not <br />compatible with surrounding designs and neighborhoods, nor was it designed or <br />oriented toward the pedestrian and denied the request. <br />City Council's three options following completion of its public hearing on the proposal <br />are as follows: <br />1. Deny the application; <br />2. Approve the application; <br />3. Approve the application with conditions; or <br />4. Remand the application to the Planning Commission. <br />If City Council chooses to remand the proposal to the Planning Commission, a public <br />hearing will be scheduled for June 11th. If Council chooses to deny the project or <br />approve the project, staff requested the City Council direct staff to prepare a draft <br />resolution of denial, or approval for Council consideration and continue the public <br />hearing to a future meeting date. <br />56 <br />