My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 05 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
6/10/2015 10:11:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 05 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 19, 2015 <br />Page 26 of 34 <br />Erik Hartronft, 817 Lincoln Avenue, Louisville, CO noted the Main Street realignment <br />confuses him. The initial planning for Louisville downtown was a grid and was planned <br />that way, not suburban swoop. He asked Council to respect property rights and to not <br />hold property owners hostage. He thought it best to forget realignment so land owners <br />can move on and it not be so costly to the City. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 S. Palisade, Louisville, CO stated she did not understand why the <br />workshop was being dismissed. She felt the baseline was wrong and should reflect <br />what residents want. She saw a lack of perspective in this plan; need to know what the <br />population limit is. She felt there was a need to have open space added. She thought <br />with added residential, the City would never meet demand for parking. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Mayor Muckle called for Council comment with the recognition this would be continued <br />to another meeting. <br />Council member Lipton doesn't see cost benefit to the City or social cost to property <br />owners. He doesn't support the Main Street realignment and would like to not spend <br />any more time on it. Pleas from the community are very compelling. He proposed <br />taking it off the table. Density and growth would have a significant impact. He asked to <br />consider not dramatically changing the community character. <br />Council member Leh felt this is an important process and thanked property owners for <br />speaking. He was not interested in increasing density in this corridor. He noted <br />realignment has some community support and whatever decision is made, needs to be <br />done expeditiously. <br />Council member Stolzmann liked the Main Street corridor being straight and the ability <br />to look straight north from Community Park. She felt the realignment actually took away <br />the gateway. She supported taking the crossing piece; separating the alignment and <br />taking it off the table. She noted the intent was not to be non - communicative and <br />encouraged residents to speak up and let Council know how they could better <br />communicate. On density, she felt the workshop option had some merit but did not <br />understand changing the zoning from PCZD to mixed use. She felt it would make <br />development of commercial spaces harder. She did not support changing the zoning on <br />the key corner on the east side of this corridor from retail. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed with much of what was said and noted maintaining character was <br />important. He noted projects are coming to fruition because many want to live in <br />Louisville. If nothing different is done or changes made, what the future will look like is a <br />valuable conversation. He thought the property owners deserved a decision soon and <br />suggested a traffic study to see if it really was a huge cost with minimal advantage. He <br />asked staff to subtract projects that are completed or scheduled for completion to better <br />see what is really available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.