City Council Minutes 1995 11 08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Junge stated that some of the signs are internal to the project and will not be visible from McCaslin. Sisk agreed with Davidson. He did not want McCaslin turned into a mini-Wadsworth. Junge asked for a recess to resolve this. RECESS Davidson called for a six minute recess. Council returned from recess. Junge stated that included in their calculations were the bank, Allstate, and daycare center (wall signs, not the pylon signs) and proposed that the number not exceed 800 s.f. They wanted to leave the pylon signs that are proposed in the PUD as they are directional signs. They would agree to a uniform color scheme for the signs with the exception of the first floor of Lot 10A and the restaurant on 9A. Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 62, Series 1995, final Subdivision Replat and PUD of Century Office Park with the following conditions: All of the conditions from Planning Commission; no drive up restaurants within the park; include Wood's language that all buildings will adhere to the architectural guidelines, specifically the restaurant on Lot 9A (Mayer asked Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, and Wood to work out the language for the architectural control); that the signage throughout the park be consistent, applicable to Lot 9 as well as the rest of the park; and that the total wall signage not exceed 800 s.f. Seconded by Howard. Sisk offered a friendly amendment to indicate a maximum on pylon signage. Mayer agreed, as did seconder, Howard. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 6 - 0 vote with Lathrop being absent. AMENDMENT TO THE MEADOWS AT COAL CREEK SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT: RESOLUTION NO. 56, SERIES 1995 - MEADOWS AT COAL CREEK, HOLD ON BUILDING PERMITS -- VIOLATION OF THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 17, 1995) Bill Simmons, City Administrator, stated that since the October 17 Council meeting, he and the City Attorney had met with the Subdivider and his attorney. In this amendment the City agreed to provider a one year lease of outlot L for use as necessary to close the gas well. The Subdivider agreed to bring action against Gerrity Oil and Gas to require the closing of the well. The City will not be a party to the action unless it expressly consents to being a party. At the end of the one year lease, if the gas well had not been closed and/or the above ground equipment had not been removed, the City may draw on the improvement guarantee to purchase the gas well through condemnation and