Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 2, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 27 <br />Council member Lipton suggested more discussion after staff had a chance to study <br />and flesh it out. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if Council was willing to let staff go forward with current <br />suggestions. <br />City Manager Fleming summarized. The market altemative is off the table. There is a <br />question on the currently allowed about how realistic it is, based on the maximum build - <br />out per current zoning. The analysis should look more closely at individual parcels of <br />land to determine what might develop. He noted this would likely bring the numbers <br />down somewhat in all three categories. <br />Mayor Muckle suggested looking at what is realistic and creating an alternative option. <br />Council member Keany suggested some Planning Commission members and Council <br />members work with staff to move the process along. Mayor Muckle supported directing <br />staff to compare existing, entitled and a new blended option. <br />Council member Stolzmann wanted not "entitled" but a "likely estimate" and c alling it a <br />workshop blend. <br />Mayor Muckle noted Council is asking staff to proceed to next level of study by <br />comparing existing land use, a likely estimate and a workshop blend. <br />QUESTIONS FOR MCCASLIN BOULEVARD SMALL AREA PLAN SURVEY <br />Continued from 03/17/2015 & 5/19/15 <br />Mayor Muckle requested a staff presentation. <br />Council member Keany asked if Council s hould proceed with the McCaslin survey if the <br />South Boulder Road Small Area Plan is not progressing. Council member Stolzmann <br />supported the suggestion with the idea of learning from the first process. <br />Council member Lipton wanted to be realistic about how long South Boulder Road <br />would take. If McCaslin is delayed, the Council may have to react to not what is wanted <br />but what is already there. He suggested moving forward. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ suggested for the South Boulder Road Plan, <br />staff only look at the allowed land uses from a zoning perspective and strictly from a <br />design perspective. He noted with the principles there is no reason to look at the <br />different land use scenarios. The community expressed wanting a more walkable <br />environment and enjoyed what they saw in the Alfalfa's development design. He <br />suggested in the SBR small area a plan to divorce zoning from design. The market will <br />dictate development on the corridor and he didn't want to delay the McCaslin corridor <br />planning. <br />