My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 06 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 06 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 11:11:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 06 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 2, 2015 <br />Page 15 of 27 <br />Council member Loo felt no one likely wanted to see residential on the Sam's club site. <br />Council member Leh wanted community input on alternatives they might tolerate. <br />Planner II Robinson noted the first proposed question might have some of same <br />problems as question 8. He was concerned about framing the questions with fiscal <br />language. He suggested putting the area description in the introductory letter. <br />Council m ember Stolzmann suggested instead of doing a survey to get a range, staff do <br />a low, medium and high and then survey the altematives. Mayor Muckle wasn't sure <br />how to accomplish that. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ asked about land use mixture with high, <br />medium, low and a variety of uses and let staff provide that high, medium, low. Then <br />the survey could be done from a community character perspective. Physical form and <br />character information will inform design guidelines and staff can create a range <br />dropping the use questions out of the survey. The form questions would stay in place <br />and could even be expanded. <br />Council member Stolzmann noted this would leave the picture questions in and take <br />most of the word questions out. <br />MOTION : Mayor Muckle moved direction to staff be to get design and form information <br />and not ask use questions. He also moved the Current use information be a part of the <br />cover letter. Dalton seconded. All in favor. <br />REVIEW AND ENDORSEMENT OF OPPORTUNITIES/ CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS <br />AND MEASURES OF SUCCESS FOR MCCASLIN BOULEVARD SMALL AREA <br />PLAN <br />Mayor Muckle requested a staff presentation. <br />Scott Robinson, Planner II, reviewed the study area along McCaslin Boulevard. <br />1. Defines desired land uses for the corridor; <br />2. Establishes preferred physical character (design guidelines); <br />3. Outlines public infrastructure priorities <br />Process <br />• Phase 1 — Desire: Set goals <br />• Phase 2 — Discovery: Corridor analysis <br />• Phase 3 — Design: Develop alternatives <br />• Phase 4 — Discussion: Select preferred alternative <br />• Phase 5 — Documentation: Codify results <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.