My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 06 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 06 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 11:11:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 06 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 2, 2015 <br />Page 14 of 27 <br />now. Help them understand so they can determine if it needs to be changed. Doing <br />things in the abstract will not provide good information. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Lipton asked about question #7. It has to do with sales and use tax <br />rebates, not a land use decision. This is for grants to promote business and he <br />suggested not getting into issues of financing and thought the question was to be <br />removed. On question #8 he suggested changing to "would you support each of the <br />following types of residences, if any". He wanted to allow for a "none of the above" <br />response. Planner II Robinson confirmed that response was included. <br />Council member Loo questioned whether people understood the terms used for housing <br />types. She suggested testing the concept. <br />Council member Keany felt the terms were common except perhaps mixed use. He <br />asked if there was any discussion about the difference in value between residential and <br />commercial or changing uses. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ noted the participants of the workshop <br />receive more detail. The Envision Louisville site does not contain the narration or the <br />facilitation provided at the workshop, but similar questions. The community wide survey <br />is to show the desire of the community. Those are blended to allow Council to make a <br />decision. This broad brush approach of public outreach allows Council to then get into <br />specifics. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed there needed to be some context to what is currently in the area <br />and proposed a question "the area covered by the McCaslin Small Area. Plan has the <br />purpose of providing a commercial tax base for Louisville. It consists of land set aside <br />for retail and office developments. The retail outlets provide shopping and dining <br />opportunities for residents and nonresidents. Offices provide customers for retail stores <br />and dining outlets as well as commercial property taxes. The area provides <br />approximately 53% of Louisville's retail tax revenue and 32% of our consumer use tax. <br />How would you like to see this area used in the future - Please choose one of the <br />following: 1. Continuous present use of office and retail stores 2. Consider rezoning to <br />allow for a mix of high density residential development, retail outlets and office buildings <br />3. Rezone for single family use, retail outlets and office buildings." <br />He agreed with staff in not asking if the community wanted housing in places already <br />determined to not have it. He was not opposed to asking about Sam's club specifically, <br />what the residents would like to see. He would like to see the design questions. <br />Council member Lipton liked Mayor Muckle's suggestions and wanted to also get rid of <br />question #7. He liked the idea of setting the foundation in the first suggested question, <br />but was uncertain about the Sam's club question because of the complexity of the <br />issues there. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).