My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2015 07 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2015 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2015 07 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:00 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 9:46:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2015 07 28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 28, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 28 <br />City Attorney Light explained a condition could be added to Resolution No. 47, Series <br />2015. A note on the PUD would reflect a parking agreement shall be required when a <br />restaurant with bar demonstrates the parking demand is requested. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained there is a potential for a proposed <br />restaurant with bar use, which would require a higher parking ratio. <br />Mayor Muckle inquired about other uses requiring a higher parking ratio. Planner and <br />Building Safety Director Russ explained such use would require a shared parking <br />agreement or the application would be denied. Principal Planner McCartney explained <br />this is a six -unit development and the use of each unit would determine the parking <br />allocation. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained if a use goes out of business and <br />a new tenant finish is requested, the Building Department would forward the request to <br />the Planning Department. The Planning Department reviews the request from a use <br />perspective and parking is part of such review. <br />City Attorney Light reviewed the condition to the resolution that the PUD shall note the <br />following: "The City will have the right to require a shared parking agreement when a <br />use generating a parking ratio in excess of 7 spaces per 1,000 SF is proposed to be <br />sited within the development ". <br />ORDINANCE No 1696, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Ordinance No.1696, Series 2015 on <br />second and final reading, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. Roll call vote was taken <br />and the motion carried by a vote of 6 -0. Absent: Council member Keany. <br />RESOLUTION No. 46, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 46, Series 2015, seconded <br />by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. All were in favor. Absent: Council member Keany. <br />RESOLUTION No. 47, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 47, Series 2015, as <br />amended, seconded by Council member Lipton. <br />City Attorney Light explained the amendment to the resolution provides the City the right <br />to require a shared parking agreement; it does not force a shared parking agreement. <br />City Manager Fleming clarified the intent is for anything in excess of the 91 parking <br />spaces. There would not be a combination of uses to exceed the level of 7 spaces per <br />1,000 SF. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.