My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 08 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 08 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:09 PM
Creation date
8/21/2015 1:24:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 08 18
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 28, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 28 <br />not abiding by the laws and disagreed with most of the points made about the sale of <br />the property. <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing. <br />City Attorney Light stated for the record, there is not any provision in Charter, the City's <br />Ordinances or the Purchasing Policy, which requires the City Council to dispose of <br />excess real estate solely for the purpose of a monetary consideration. The surplus <br />property provision of the Purchasing Policy has related definitions that exclude real <br />property. City Council could, if they chose, adopt such a policy; however the current <br />policy does not have a provision that real property be sold for the highest monetary <br />consideration offered. The City Charter requires any transfer of property be approved <br />by ordinance. The purchase contract recognizes this requirement and states closing <br />would not occur until the ordinance is approved. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Lipton stated Council must represent the interests and values of their <br />constituents. This entails balancing the economic interests, the social interests, <br />preserving the small town character, and supporting small town businesses. He agreed <br />with Mayor Muckle this is a fair value. He felt the small town character is supportive of <br />the City's interest. He did not feel this was a business assistance project, nor a special <br />deal for this business. He was in favor of the sale. <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Ordinance No.1698, Series 2015 on <br />second and final reading, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. Roll call vote was taken <br />and the motion carried by a vote of 5 -1. Council member Stolzmann voted no. Absent: <br />Council member Keany. <br />GATEWAY ANNEXATION <br />1. RESOLUTION No. 50, SERIES 2015 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN <br />AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO THE GATEWAY ANNEXATION <br />AGREEMENT <br />2. ORDINANCE No. 1694, SERIES 2015 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING <br />ORDINANCES Nos. 1165 AND 1166, SERIES 1994 CONCERNING THE <br />GATEWAY ANNEXATION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN <br />ADDENDUM TO ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — 2nd Reading — Public <br />Hearing <br />3. RESOLUTION No. 51, SERIES 2015 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN <br />AMENDMENT TO THE GATEWAY FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br />(PUD) TO MODIFY THE HEIGHT ALLOWANCE LANGUAGE ON LOT 1, <br />BLOCK 1 FROM "1 STORY WITH A 26 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT" <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.