Laserfiche WebLink
any developments in Boulder County that could hurt Boulder <br />commercially. He felt Louisville needs to purchase and control <br />this land themselves. He stated that Boulder County and Lafayette <br />do not have Louisville's best interests in mind, but Louisville's <br />City Council should. His idea was to develop 1/3 of the area along <br />Hwy. 42 and South Boulder Road commercially to recover Louisville's <br />initial investment, leave 1/3/ fallow for the nature lovers in <br />Louisville, and turn the remaining 1/3/ into family facilities, <br />such as: parks, bike paths, much needed ball fields, and family <br />recreational activities. He stated that not one of the Louisville <br />Administrators had contacted the Lastokas about the purchase of the <br />property. Lafayette and Boulder County have. He asked Council to <br />vote against the joint purchase. <br /> <br />Anthony DelPizzo, 1337 Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO, agreed <br />with Mr. Ferguson. He did wonder if the Council would or will <br />discuss that property with the people that own it, before they make <br />any rash decisions with Lafayette and Boulder County. He didn't <br />feel Lafayette and Boulder County should have anything to do with <br />the way Louisville runs its community. <br /> <br />Bill Frazier, 1122 W. Enclave, Louisville, CO, stated that it would <br />be highly desirable to have this property as open space as a buffer <br />between the two towns. He didn't understand why Louisville has to <br />own it outright. <br /> <br />Joyce Beckham, 1512 Euclid Circle, Lafayette, CO, was concerned <br />that the backyard, where her deck is, faces the property and she <br />was concerned about the lighting of the possible ball fields. She <br />asked for Council indulgence concerning the possible lighting. <br /> <br />Pat Hornbostel, 655 W. Hawthorn Street, Louisville, CO, stated that <br />the people of Louisville want open space. He felt that it is in <br />Louisville's interest not to allow further development along South <br />Boulder Road. He stated that if Louisville has strip development <br />down South Boulder Road, Louisville will no longer be an <br />identifiable community. Louisville has an advantage, because it's <br />perceived as being adjacent to Boulder open space, which is why <br />people come to this community. He explained that if we become part <br />of the East County urban sprawl, Louisville loses that advantage <br />and the value of the Louisville homes will ultimately be lower <br />because of that. <br /> <br />Susan Morris, 939 W. Maple Court, Louisville, CO, encouraged the <br />Council to vote "yes" and participate in this long awaited <br />agreement. She felt this was a unique opportunity to cooperate <br />with our neighbors to everyone's benefit. She stated that visual <br />relief from development that the Lastoka and Aquarius properties <br />provide is significant to allow Louisville to retain its identity. <br />She did not want Council trading parcels to allow partial <br />commercial development of the southeast corner, because undeveloped <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />