My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 01 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 01 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 9:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/19/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 01 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
average of 8,300 square feet, approximately. Minimum lot size <br />requirement for this zoned district RE is 12,000 square feet. He <br />stated that Outlot 1 is approximately 20,000 square feet or about <br />an half acre in area. It comprises about 23% of the subdivision, <br />is designated as an on-site detention area, and is to be maintained <br />and owned by the homeowners association. <br /> <br />Jim Leach, President of Wonderland Hills Development Company stated <br />that he and Jon Prouty are partners in this development. He <br />explained that this was a difficult site to work with, because it's <br />an infill site. It has a configuration that makes it difficult the <br />way it strings out along on Pine Street, being a transition site <br />between the old part of Louisville and the new development that has <br />occurred, mostly by McStain and some things across the street in <br />Ridgefield. He explained that they wanted to try to create a <br />little community that would bridge the gap between the old part of <br />town and the new development. Something that would pick up some of <br />the character of the old town, to try to get the automobiles around <br />behind the houses and show just the front of the homes. (Leach <br />pointed out on a sketch he was showing Council.) He explained that <br />this was presented at the first presentation to the Planning Board, <br />and at that time they gave them a unanimous approval to go ahead <br />with the concept. There were nine lots on it, which they dropped <br />to eight, but it showed Council the charter, kind of a traditional <br />look without garages facing out to the street, or without the <br />backyards along Pine street like you see in some places, where they <br />are just fenced off. He stated that they wanted to use alleys to <br />access the houses in the traditional manner, but the City isn't <br />geared to that type of development anymore. <br /> <br />Hedding: <br /> <br />It appears, in this plan, that the <br />two car garages and some of the <br />units are adjoining and that they <br />have a common wall or something? <br />Does that present any kind of a <br />problem for the potential owners <br />with their fire insurance? Does <br />that change things? <br /> <br />Leach: <br /> <br />No it doesn't. We just use a party <br />wall agreement. The garages are <br />constructed separately. There is a <br />fire wall between them, so it's not <br />an insurance issue or an ownership <br />issue. The reason we did that was <br />to create some wider open spaces, <br />rather than have setbacks and narrow <br />little lanes between some of the <br />garages. We were able to create a <br />better south yard for the houses. I <br />can't remember how many that occurs <br />on, but it's not all of them. <br /> <br />Hedding: <br /> <br />I always favor actual dedicated land <br />as opposed to money, but I read the <br />comments from the Planning <br />Commission and understand that you <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.