Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 1, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 18 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton asked if a separate Tree Board was required or can it be part of <br />another board. The City does have the requisite forestry staff so the City would not lose <br />that designation. <br />Council member Lipton explained several months ago he suggested looking at the <br />boards before soliciting applications for appointments. He stated parks do not have an <br />advocate from the land perspective, nor is there a recreation board.. He noted other <br />cities have parks and recreation boards, who may look at issues such as additions and <br />improvements. He felt there is a need for a parks and recreation group to work with <br />staff to advocate for the needs of the facilities. With respect to the golf course, he felt <br />the Golf Course Advisory Board should be maintained for at least another year. <br />He noted that on the list of boards, the City Council Committees do not have purpose <br />descriptions. He suggested some discussion about the role of the City Council's Water, <br />Legal, and Finance Committees and if they are needed as permanent Council <br />Committees. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated she valued all the volunteer boards and <br />commissions. She suggested when Council discusses boards and committees they <br />consider inviting all the board and committee chairs to attend the meeting.. She felt it <br />would be helpful to have a proposal before Council when discussing a Parks and <br />Recreation Board. She felt it made sense to have the Horticulture and Forestry Board <br />pick up some of the parks duties, but she was not convinced a Parks and Recreation <br />Board is a small enough topic for one board and may require two boards... She felt the <br />Sustainability Board has made excellent progress with their road map. She felt instead <br />of one Sustainability Board, have one Sustainability Board member on each of the other <br />boards to better facilitate their understanding of sustainability in the community. She <br />noted the Golf Course Advisory Board suggested putting sunsets on all the Advisory <br />Boards so there is some regular review of their mission. She agreed there should be <br />some sort of review. She addressed the non- profit 501 c3 boards that are affiliated with <br />various City boards and wondered if those (fund- raising) boards were working <br />effectively for the City. With respect to the. Golf Course Board, she hoped their scope of <br />work would include developing and monitoring a critical operations matrix for evaluation <br />to be reported to the City Council. She noted before the flood the Golf Course Advisory <br />Board discussed community programs for non - golfers. She felt, as a goal, those <br />programs should be started again to provide recreational opportunity to the residents. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated he agreed with much of Council member Stolzmann's <br />comments. He felt it would be appropriate for the Council to set up a review of each <br />board's mission periodically. Perhaps every five years. He did not agree with sun - <br />setting all the boards and then reintroducing them as it would cause uncertainty. With <br />respect to the sun - setting of the Golf Course Advisory Board, he agreed with the Board <br />that sun - setting should only occur when the Board feels it is appropriate. <br />Mayor Muckle also agreed with many of Council member Stolzmann's comments. He <br />did not feel the Council or staff should be overtaxed by adding boards. The reason for <br />