Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 1, 2015 <br />Page 15 of 18 <br />is budgeted, the City Manager could approve the expenditure as long as the scope of <br />the project did not change. If the scope of the project changes, he felt there should be <br />Council discussion. He felt the purchase of products, equipment and CIP projects that <br />are budgeted should be approved by the City Manager, but consulting services and <br />service contracts should be reviewed by Council. <br />Mayor Muckle requested the resolution be brought back at the second reading of the <br />ordinance. He agreed there should be some range or policy where the City Manager <br />would bring the budget request to the City Council. <br />Council member Stolzmann agreed the resolution should be brought back with the <br />second reading of the ordinance, which would provide sufficient time for a Finance <br />Committee review. She stated if there is something over budget or if there is a. policy <br />issue it should be brought before the City Council. She noted there were very few items <br />listed, which were in the range. <br />Council member Leh addressed the quality of the projects within the proposed <br />additional authority of the City Manager. He stated there may be project contracts, <br />which have nothing to do with the dollar value, but may be very controversial. He <br />suggested the City Manager provide some language in reference to the quality is met. <br />City Manager Fleming stated the existing policy does have a provision which states any <br />purchase the City Manager deems is questionable or has policy implications shall <br />require City Council approval. <br />Council member Loo was pleased with the discussion and agreed with Council member <br />Stolzmann that very few projects were listed within the proposed range. <br />Council member Lipton stated he wanted to keep the policy as streamlined and simple <br />as possible. He felt Council should focus on raising the limits. <br />Mayor Muckle felt the resolution and ordinance is codifying what is already happening. <br />He did not foresee a major change in policy for the City staff. <br />RESOLUTION No. 62, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION:. Mayor Muckle moved to continue Resolution No. 62, Series 2015 to <br />September15, 2015, seconded by Council member Lipton. All were in favor. <br />ORDINANCE No. 1701, SERIES 2015 <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Ordinance No. 1701, Series 2015 on first <br />reading, ordered it published and set a public hearing for September 15, 2015, <br />seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. All were in favor. <br />