City Council Study Session Summary 2015 04 28

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

City Council Study Session Summary April 28, 2015 Page 3 of 4 Preservation Master Plan will address: • Goals • Projects • Program Operations • Period of Significance • Sustainability of grant program • Outreach and Education HPC would like feedback on the Austin - Niehoff use and funding. Preservation Master Plan schedule — schedule has been altered slightly, would like feedback. HPC funding and Legislative Issues • Continued Support for landmarking and grant program • Legislative issues that arise from Preservation Master Plan • Made some changes to bylaws. Endorsement of goals by council will happen either May 5th or May 19t" A contractor forum is being held that is part of the Master Plan. The code is written that a re -roof requires a demo permit. Council member Stolzmann would like clarification of code on demo and repair. What will it take to get the revolving loan fund going? There was a discussion of how the program will work. Council member Dalton asked for choices to be presented to Council. Are remedies in the Resolution from last year sufficient? There needs to be more discussion in HPC. Have explored creating conference space in Austin Niehof; the building could use a facelift. There was discussion of construction of the building, the period of significance and asbestos. Perhaps the rehab of the building could be a demonstration project. How do people start the process of landmarking their house? Creation of a handout on how the process starts is on the HPC to -do list. Look at the Boulder website to see what is on their website. Council member Dalton asked questions about Historic Structure Assessment architects. There is a pre - qualified list and was compiled through an RFP.