Laserfiche WebLink
really can't tell from this, if my <br />concerns have been addressed or not. <br />If Council so wished, it could <br />always be referred back to the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Brand: <br /> <br />I suggested.to the applicant that <br />they not go to the expense of <br />preparing a formal plat until they <br />had some indication from Council of <br />what was acceptable and what was <br />not. This falls again into the new <br />calendar that you discussed in <br />conjunction with the Planning <br />Commission recently that things come <br />to you (Council) first, so that you <br />can give your reaction; so that the <br />applicant and the Planning <br />Commission is going to know what it <br />is that you will accept and won't. <br />When the applicant was before you <br />before, you told him that it was too <br />dense, they had to remove a lot, and <br />there had to be some provision for <br />guest parking, and something else. <br />I suggested that they not prepare a <br />formal plat, which involves a lot of <br />money and time. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Silver: <br /> <br />I get the feeling that the applicant <br />feels that they could have their <br />plan approved here tonight. <br /> <br />My impression was that there was a <br />procedure by which if the Council <br />wished to reconsider its prior <br />action with the modifications we <br />made, that that will occur at this <br />time. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />The most rapid rate, if you want a <br />formal plan to look at, would be for <br />someone who voted to deny it to make <br />a motion to reconsider and send it <br />back to the Planning Commission and <br />they'd only go back to the final <br />hearing. You wouldn't start all <br />over again. <br /> <br />Lathrop moved that, as a person that voted against it, Council <br />reconsider the application, site Plan A, for the West Pine Street <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />