Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 17, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />Karp said this is all negotiable he just wanted to hear the thoughts of the <br />commission. <br />The commission thanked him for coming in. <br />Stewart rejoined the meeting. <br />Updates from Staff — Demolition Updates, Alteration Certificate Updates, <br />and Upcoming Schedule <br />Demolition Updates <br />Trice presented the information from the packet. <br />1145 Grant - July 29, 2015 planning staff and subcommittee reviewed a roof <br />replacement. The permit was released because the changes would not impair <br />the structure and would help to preserve the structure. <br />Watson asked for future clarification on what was replaced on the roof. It helps <br />clarify things in the future. <br />1208 Jefferson - July 29, 2015 planning staff and subcommittee reviewed a roof <br />replacement. The permit was released because the changes would not impair <br />the structure and would help to preserve the structure. <br />1230 Lafarge — August 6, 2015 planning staff and subcommittee reviewed a roof <br />replacement. The permit was released because the changes would not impair <br />the structure and would help to preserve the structure. <br />1324 Lincoln — August 4, 2015 planning staff and subcommittee reviewed a roof <br />replacement. The permit was released because the changes would not impair <br />the structure and would help to preserve the structure. <br />945 Griffith - July 29, 2015 planning staff and subcommittee reviewed a roof <br />replacement. The permit was released because the changes would not impair <br />the structure and would help to preserve the structure. <br />Alteration Certificate Updates <br />927 Main — August 3, 2015 planning staff and subcommittee reviewed an <br />alteration certificate for a roof replacement. The permit was released because <br />the changes would not impair the structure and would help to preserve the <br />structure. <br />Stewart stated an alteration certificate to a landmarked structure is very different <br />than modifications to a non - landmarked structure. He doesn't believe a full <br />demolition review should be required for a non - landmarked structure. <br />